Hope to have more info soon.
In regards to adding more lift to the Peaks. In my opinion, doing so has been and would be counter to the initial design intent of the Peak, which is
a purpose built alpine touring kite. IMO they pretty much nailed it with the Peak 1. Low lift, packable, broad wind range and extremely simple bar
design. Minimalist, efficient and supremely capable at what it was designed to do. It wasn't until FS increased the lift and AR in a effort to make
the kite sportier, that the Peak series started having issues. By trying to adapt it to a broader use spectrum and adding some freestyle ability to
it, the Peak became less proficient at it's initial purpose and yet not really a competent freestyle kite. Still a very good and amazing kite but less
of a purpose built piece of equipment.
Is the goal to have what is arguably the best purpose built touring kite in the world with the best light wind performance in it's price range or a
budget freestyle kite? Which, let's be honest, if you make a budget kite that has a lot of lift that is likely to attract beginners learning on their
own, it's not the best combination. Whereas the original and Peak 2 allow a high margin of safety for people just starting out. Which allows and
encourages long term participation in the sport.
I'm sold on the single skin design. And I feel that there is room for a high performance variant. But instead of taking the Peak from it's intended
purpose and turning it into something else there should be other variants designed specifically to do certain things. Call it the Peak Freeride, make
it higher AR and liftier with the fancy bar. And make a Peak Tour with low lift, low AR and high grunt with a minimalist bar that once again fits in
my Camel Bak. :D |