Power Kite Forum

Well now that you've seen it...

cheezycheese - 29-2-2012 at 11:54 AM

Well now that you've seen it...
I know a lot of you say it doesn't matter what a kite looks like buuuuutttt after all the Hype what do you guys think of the Phantom II graphics....?

martinipro - 29-2-2012 at 11:55 AM

I am yet to see a top skin pic!

ripsessionkites - 29-2-2012 at 12:36 PM

enjoy!!!

screen-capture.png - 117kB

cheezycheese - 29-2-2012 at 01:01 PM

Eeehhhh.... :dunno: the black and green is ok I guess. But I Hoped for a larger phantom image... :dunno:

Drewculous - 29-2-2012 at 01:05 PM

Man I had hopes for the red and blue but bleh!!

Green one is sweet!

I wish they wouldve kept it black and a color, for the size... A black and yellow 18 wouldve been sick!! (blue/blk 15, etc)

Omg, red and black 6m! Oh man!

mougl - 29-2-2012 at 02:00 PM

Green and the red are sexy

shehatesmyhobbies - 29-2-2012 at 03:16 PM

I really expected a little more retro graphics, more like the original, just adding a little jazz to it. I like the black and green as well as the red, wht, and black. In the end though, I still look forward to hooking into one and taking off down the beach!

flyjump - 29-2-2012 at 03:25 PM

Im thinking custom colors :) if you had a choice what colors would you chose

Feyd - 29-2-2012 at 03:48 PM

Boys, I know that everyone was looking for something a little more sinister. A little more Phantomesque.

But I gotta tell ya that the computer images don't do it justice. It's the best looking Arc since the Venoms and they look great in real life.

The wingtip graphics are actually pretty good too.

(thanks to Tom Mitchell for the shot)

TEMitchell _3911sm.jpg - 218kB

g00fba11 - 29-2-2012 at 04:17 PM

The only one that does it for me is the black and green........ I would have liked to have seen them carry the black out scheme through out the line and only change the graphic color.......

I think an all black with the blue or red would then be as awesome as the green..... IMHO......

Hoping to start out with a Black/Green 15m........

AD72 - 29-2-2012 at 04:39 PM

Does the green and black version come with an X-Box?
Actually I like the graphics.

Todd - 29-2-2012 at 04:43 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by flyjump
Im thinking custom colors :) if you had a choice what colors would you chose



Black and green with black lower skin :ninja:

indigo_wolf - 29-2-2012 at 04:51 PM

Black & red, black lower skin, dark orange wingtip graphics..... side of fries and a frozen Coke too. :smilegrin:

ATB,
Sam

markite - 29-2-2012 at 04:57 PM

I think like many others i like the strength of the black green - would have been nice to have some of the rarer colours used as the accent with the punchy black to set it off.
purple/black and years ago there were a few flame orange kites (more toward a warm red) that stood out nicely. Looking forward to spanking the small sizes around on a buggy to see what they do.

treblehook - 29-2-2012 at 05:01 PM

You can get Racer X as a team rider

images.jpg - 7kB

Kamikuza - 29-2-2012 at 05:13 PM

... I would have let them have my kewl design for free :lol:
I'm a bit obsessed at the moment it seems, but it reminds me of - \m/ :D

PHREERIDER - 29-2-2012 at 05:22 PM

not concerned on the colors or graphics, it just needs to do its thing.

doneski - 29-2-2012 at 05:23 PM

Bland generic graphics. Nothing to brag about.

Feyd - 29-2-2012 at 05:24 PM

We've nick named them "X-wings" here.

PHREERIDER - 29-2-2012 at 06:25 PM

black green unit is tight , i must say.

tridude - 29-2-2012 at 07:05 PM

agree Phree...................Feyd great pic with the kite and you setting a serious edge.....................gotta try the frozne thing one of these dayz...................

BeamerBob - 29-2-2012 at 07:07 PM

I needed one bad today. I would've flown one right down beside I-15 with Dora the Explorer on it. Yes, the Black and green are awesome. I wonder how long I'll lay out the tarp to keep them off the lakebed? :smug::lol:

tridude - 29-2-2012 at 07:12 PM

after seeing the web site shots and Feyds lake shot Im stoked and humbled to fly the P2 and new LEIs.....................Im hoping to surf and turf the P2!:o

erratic winds - 29-2-2012 at 07:14 PM

loooove the red/black/white colorset.

lad - 29-2-2012 at 08:03 PM

Take note:
Something tells me the PL dealers are going to have a lot of blue and red PII overstock...:smug:

Drewculous - 29-2-2012 at 08:08 PM

^ :lol:

Feyd - 1-3-2012 at 04:35 AM

@ Tridude, that shot was just cruising across the lake.

This is what it looks like when you really drive the edge.:spin:

15mpoweredsm.jpg - 214kB

lad - 1-3-2012 at 05:27 AM

What's odd is that thing really seems to have more of a Syn/Charger type AR & profile...you'd never suspect it's a Phantom follow-up.

Must be the "secret sauce!"

Feyd - 1-3-2012 at 05:50 AM

Don't let the camera angle fool ya.

Here's a shot of the proto 15m that better illustrates the difference between the Charger and Ph2.

Proto15m.jpg - 46kB

lunchbox - 1-3-2012 at 07:16 AM

+1 for the Green and Black...although I was expecting something more Phantomish...

So, (and forgive me if this has already been discussed), what are the Pros and Cons versus old and new?

mougl - 1-3-2012 at 07:43 PM

Reminds me of something.....





Designers happen to be Vin Diesel fans?


I still like the green best :)

Drewculous - 1-3-2012 at 07:50 PM

Feyd... Dump.... All..... Phantom.... Pics.... NOW!

ripsessionkites - 3-3-2012 at 03:57 AM

I forgot to add that the 24m will only come in black with orange x graphic

lad - 3-3-2012 at 07:46 AM

24mm?!?!? :karate:

mougl - 3-3-2012 at 08:28 AM

24m?????????????????!


:eekdrull:

lad - 3-3-2012 at 09:31 AM

We need a pic of that one...in flight! :Ange09:

ripsessionkites - 3-3-2012 at 09:57 AM

i have no inflight pics ... Mr.King Krug does i believe and still working on the product shots for dealers.

peterlynnphantom2012orange.gif - 7kB

Bladerunner - 4-3-2012 at 09:33 AM

Too bad about the white on the blue + red ones. They might have looked as good as the green black ?

Feyd - 5-3-2012 at 04:58 PM

I don't think the white and blue or red ones will look so bad.....

http://hardwaterkiter.blogspot.com/

rocfighter - 5-3-2012 at 05:43 PM

OK so there the shape of a phantom, But they don't have the kick @ss attitude of the origanal. Always problem with a follow-up. :cool:
Whats next PL Geurilla II with a Spidermonkey on it? Where is the Phantom?
Of course as a power/traction kite it does look whicked cool:smilegrin:. And yes the Green/Black are the best. Just expected the image of the Phantom on there.
Dave

cheezycheese - 5-3-2012 at 05:56 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rocfighter
OK so there the shape of a phantom, But they don't have the kick @ss attitude of the origanal. Always problem with a follow-up. :cool:
Whats next PL Geurilla II with a Spidermonkey on it? Where is the Phantom?
Of course as a power/traction kite it does look whicked cool:smilegrin:. And yes the Green/Black are the best. Just expected the image of the Phantom on there.
Dave


My thoughts exactly. They could have called this kite anything but phantom and I would have felt better about it. It's just hard to accept it as a phantom...

(again all comments based on appearance only)

erratic winds - 5-3-2012 at 06:05 PM

gah that red white black looks so good!

PHREERIDER - 5-3-2012 at 06:16 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Feyd
Don't let the camera angle fool ya.

Here's a shot of the proto 15m that better illustrates the difference between the Charger and Ph2.


definitely phantom...i want THAT one

Feyd - 5-3-2012 at 07:14 PM

Yes the Red is very sexy in person.

@ Roc and Cheezy, the best I can say about how this wing compares to original is try it (if you can find one) before you decide it lacks the kick of the original.

I've had limited flight time on the Phantom 1 but the time that I have had on it it never made me as happy as the Phantom 2 has. Pound for pound I think the Ph2 has as much kick as the Ph1. Maybe my dissapointment with the Ph1 is based on my flying time on the F-Arcs. On the surface the Ph1 and F-Arc are very similar but the F-Arc is a damn animal and made the Ph1 feel completely gutless in comparison. Very dissapointing.

But the Ph2, that kite makes me smile.

As I've said all along, it's not going to be like the old Phantom. This, in spite of it's name, is a different, up to date Arc. Does it have some of the Phantom's qualities? Sure, but it also lacks a some of the Ph1's qualities like bowties, slow turn rate. But in the overall view of things it's a great kite and that's what matters. I spent the day on the 12m today in 25mph winds and it was a real treat. I love not having to keep an eye on the kite. I love being able to feel where it is and not having any suprises. I put it on edge and pin it.

I'd be very suprised if anyone got on one of these things and said "Meh."

I have a ton of video of the wing in action. When I get the green light from PL to release it I will and you will at least be able to see how she flies.

Feyd - 5-3-2012 at 07:21 PM

Oh, and the old Phantom face is on it. The wingtips have the same logo as in the ad at the top of this thread. It actually looks reall good. Better than I thought it would.

tridude - 5-3-2012 at 07:26 PM

CHris,

hows the relaunch of these kites and is PL listing this as a H2O wing as well?

cheezycheese - 5-3-2012 at 10:46 PM

Chris, I'm sure it's a great kite. As I mentioned before I was commenting purely on the graphics since that was a major part of the original kites appeal.

Feyd - 6-3-2012 at 08:41 AM

@ tri, The relaunch (for me on snow) has been excellent. Easier than the Charger or Syn IMO. If you have basic Arc relaunch techniques down then you will find that this thing is cake to relaunch. That said I have no idea how she will relaunch on water. I think that PL is kinda focusing this wing at more of a land based user like they did with the Scorp but I'm not entirely clear on that so please don't hold me to it.

@ Cheezy, I agree. I think we all were looking for a more Phantom 1 style on the new wing. No doubt those things look awesome going by. And I agree that the new graphic does make me think Racer X ( I used to lover speed racer as a kid) and it does look a lot like the XXX logo. I'm just glad it doesn't look like the Syn or the Charger.:spin:

lad - 6-3-2012 at 08:57 AM

Easier relaunch than the Ch or Syn?

That's interesting considering it's apparent AR - the belly is def. a little wider than the old phanny, but pretty amazing still!

Feyd - 6-3-2012 at 11:45 AM

Yeah, I know seems kinda contrary. True it's not the same AR as the old Ph1 so that lends to less bowtie action for sure.

It definately seems a lot easier to relaunch to me than previous Arcs. Maybe it's a matter of perception as Arcs have been all I fly for a few years now and a lot of the handling has become almost just muscle memory. The only kite I've flown this season that wasn't an Arc was a 9m Frenzy '05 and that was for about 8minutes.

The Ph2 relaunchs really well IMO. Even under inflated it seems better. When under inflated she tends to have front end collapse more than being bowtie prone like some of the others. And when launching with low air it's very easy to balance teh front and rear lines to offset the front end collapse. Much like you do when launching a Scorp or Phantom1 or F-Arc for example.

lad - 13-3-2012 at 07:44 PM

Feyd,

I see on your blog you got to play a little with the 24m PII :wee:


How does it compare with the huge, lo-wind Fly Surfers or the F-Arc 1600?

lad - 17-3-2012 at 10:01 AM

some new pix from across the pond (second shot looks just like a Syn/Charger to me):




Soma - 17-3-2012 at 03:04 PM

I can't help seeing dark eyes and fangs instead of an X, :D
Although the graphics of P1 are the best, :saint:

Regards and fingers crossed that the Portuguese PL dealer gets one soon to demo, :wee:
Joćo

cheezycheese - 17-3-2012 at 03:32 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Soma
I can't help seeing dark eyes and fangs instead of an X, :D
Joćo


Hey, that kinda works.... maybe they should change the name to Venom III.... :ticking:

pokitetrash - 17-3-2012 at 04:39 PM

Nice looking kite but its no Phantom... my heart lies with the old one. They should have called it something new.

pokitetrash - 17-3-2012 at 04:46 PM

Original with those screamin lines coupled with the cool Phantom skull lends itself to being like a banshee. New kite's nice though. Dissapointed.

rocfighter - 17-3-2012 at 05:31 PM

Yeah Feyd I agree with Cheezy and Chris, This may be a big bad kick ass kite. And I'm sure it is the beast it is expected to be. But sadly it lacks the Phantom attitude. And though as some one else had stated in another thread that the look is not the kite. The Phantom was in the Opra not Vin Diesel. Just expected more of a retro look on the graphics is all. Of course the Geurilla II lacks the Kong as well. So much for sequells.

mougl - 17-3-2012 at 06:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rocfighter
The Phantom was in the Opra not Vin Diesel.


:thumbup:

Feyd - 17-3-2012 at 06:23 PM

HEHEHEHEHE, that made me snicker a little bit. Maybe I'm missing something when I've flown Phantom attitude is not what came to mind.

I'll give you that the original Phantom graphic was good. But beyond that I have no feelings of nostalgia.

The new graphic new graphic is ok IMO. Sure it's not as sinister as the original but oh well, I'm over it. I can't believe so much complaining has come about about the kite based on the the graphics.

I care about how the kite flies, bottom line. People complained that the Charger was too fast, too agressive, too twitchy. Now PL has produced a kite that takes the edge of the Charger's personality, claws up wind, rips across the window, has stabilty to spare and has more verstility than any Arc I've ever flown and all we do is poo poo it because it lacks "attitude"?

I don't get it. :crazy:

All I know is I love flying it. Peter Lynn has produced a lot of great wings. I wouldn't trade the Ph2 for any of them. I don't care how good they looked. If the graphic is the deal breaker for those who wanted a new incarnation of the Phantom then I guess it illustrates what's really important to some people.

For me, it's about how the kite flies. ;)-

Feyd - 17-3-2012 at 06:25 PM

BTW, I don't know what you guys mean by "Opra".

Do you mean "Oprah" or "Opera" or am I missing something?

4mylifetime - 17-3-2012 at 06:33 PM

Well well stated Feyd.
Enough on the old graphic, time to move on.
A new kite that takes the best of the previous ones and is the best yet.
I simply cannot wait to get mine.
:wee:

mougl - 17-3-2012 at 06:51 PM

I'm not complaining, I thought the statement was funny. I agree with you when it comes to how the kite flies is more inportant than how it looks. Most of my quiver is white bottom skin kites :)

I think the thing that will be missed is the face on the kite that helped the kite achieve such a cult following. (for lack of a better phrase) When I first got into the sport I took one look at the P15 and HAD to have one, hell I STILL want a P15 :lol: but I think for me at least its because of the top skin graphic. I've flown a P15 a couple of times and it is one sweet kite. I'm sure the P2 is much better in the air than the P1. Let's face it, PL would not release a sequel to such an iconic kite if it were not improved. I'm sure once I have the opportunity to put one in the sky, the graphic will not be an issue. I just wish PL had taken a little more from the first graphic, thats all :)

as Pokite said "Original with those screamin lines coupled with the cool Phantom skull lends itself to being like a banshee." Thats the way I look at the Phantom but giving it more consideration (trying to be open minded for once lol) Would a true phantom ever let its face be seen? Screw it, I'm looking to deep into this....bring on the ripstop! :lol:

rocfighter - 17-3-2012 at 07:08 PM

Feyd like I said. I am sure it is an awesome kite.:bigok: And yes it is either Oprah or Opera! OOOps I misspelled it. Read my posts I do it a lot:yes: I just prefer the graphics of the PH1 I hope to fly the PH2 some time. And by then I'm sure this whole thing will be in the past.

lad - 17-3-2012 at 07:48 PM

I personally prefer sporty geometrics over cartoony characters.

What the P1 had going for it was the bold, bright color contrasted against black on a sleek, cutting profile.
It just looked basdaȿş!
Of course, when flying it, all you're seeing is a bland, bobbing, white rectangle! :ninja:

The Rasta 8.3 R1 I was thrashing around this evening was the completely (and literally!) reverse situation.
The simple red, yellow, green pattern and black logo on the outside...meh:yawn:
But the diffused, glowing, reverse colors behind the sharp green end points on the flyer's side...very, VERY cool! :bouncy:
Really, it is one of the coolest effects I've ever seen on any kind of kite (including most "pretty," "arty" & custom" single line kites).


PL should put the sheer white underside on all the kites they don't want to budget a bottom design for! :bigok:

zero gee - 17-3-2012 at 09:07 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by Soma
I can't help seeing dark eyes and fangs instead of an X, :D
Joćo


It's like the Phantom's Revenge... :thumbup:







"twentytwelve.the.legendary.phantom.twinskin.returns.ready.to.rumble"

markite - 17-3-2012 at 10:20 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by rocfighter
And yes it is either Oprah or Opera!


Well the cats out of the bag on who the new celebrity team rider is for Peter Lynn; it's the Phantom of the Oprah!

Phantom_of _Oprah.jpg - 70kB

lad - 17-3-2012 at 10:41 PM

Well...wouldn't THAT scare a few Plovers away! :spin::evil::spin:
(or render them infertile?)

pbc - 18-3-2012 at 03:53 AM

Quote:

Well the cats out of the bag on who the new celebrity team rider is for Peter Lynn; it's the Phantom of the Oprah!


There's the mash-up we needed. Awesome!

Philip

Feyd - 18-3-2012 at 05:42 AM

My god that eye of her's under the mask really creeps me out.:o

TEMitchell _4147sm.jpg - 202kB

Feyd - 20-3-2012 at 08:21 AM

Now that she's officially been released here's that vid I made with the 12m.

The winds were not great, I was underpowered and should have been on the 15m but I was playing with the Drift and didn't want to be completely lit. Wind was a little punch but not bad.

http://youtu.be/-W8uMHJdEaE

cheezycheese - 20-3-2012 at 08:46 AM

Underpowered you say.... :duh::thumbup: well it definitely hauls the mail !!!

**edit** or should I say hauls the male... :wee:

bobalooie57 - 20-3-2012 at 08:54 AM

:cool: I never once thought, "gee that kite looks like a dog!" (Meaning, it really doesn't matter what it looks like, does it?)

BeamerBob - 20-3-2012 at 09:50 AM

I couldn't quite get a bead on your power settings but noticed you were running with the bar all the way out, not really up against a lowered stopper either. I guess you were trimmed way out and thus powered up with the bar out?

Also odd with an arc to be able to run with your hand on top. I usually find myself pulling against autozenith on other arcs.

Kite looks fine. Yes, it could've had more of a face on it, but I'd really rather talk about how well it performs after I've been flying it than how cool I look hooked into it.

Feyd - 20-3-2012 at 11:45 AM

Hmmmmm,;-)

All I can say is I like my bar a certain way and I set it up accordingly. It works well for my purposes but may not work well for someone else's tastes.

I like good power but a litle backstall comes in handy at times. :spin:

markite - 20-3-2012 at 12:23 PM

Bobby talking about Chris flying with the bar out brings up another interesting point. There are times when I want the kite to run faster and that often means letting the bar out to a point to feel enough pressure but lets the kite get a little further out front and the speed to increase. If I want grunt power I pull in on the bar but it's a feel for what is giving power and what is giving speed. I can pull it in to feel the power but the kite slows down so at the point i pull in i might also start working the kite more. On the dry lake at speed I have it set up so the bar is lightly pulled in just to a comfortable arm position with enough to pull in a little when needed and room to push off the power at the end of the run. (that's also using my own set-up long throw bar). Too often I still see people confusing power and kite speed choking the kites too much especially in light wind hoping to get more power but stopping the kite from speeding up to deliver that power.

Also riding one hand on the bar like Chris was doing in the video, for me on the twinskins I like one hand on the upper side of the bar. It's easier to push a little with an extended arm to keep the kite down and running horizontal. One hand on the bottom side of the bar and you need to pull to keep the kite horizontal and the feel of stabilizing the flight is a little more twitchy with your arm bent and one hand on the bottom half.

there are also times when I'll just have one hand in the middle but it depends on the kite and the tendency to swing upward

geokite - 20-3-2012 at 12:44 PM

Feyd, so the kite turns faster? Not a good trait for a land kite. The last thing we need is a faster turning kite in 40mph winds on the dry lake bed.

How is the power per size of the kite? Are they more efficient, or less efficient than the original? Thanks.

Feyd - 20-3-2012 at 01:22 PM

As usual, Mark described things beautifully.

Yes Geo, the kite turns faster if you want and I think it being a good trait or bad trait is relative. I'm used to dealing with it in 35-40mph, cold ,dense, wind and it's fine for me but maybe not for someone else. I like a fast turning kite. I need it because I run at good speeds in relatively tight spaces and sometimes I need to redirect suddenly to shut off power and use the kite for braking.

With the stock bar set up it would have a broader wind range and be less twitchy for sure but I have a good feel for where my wing is and a pretty light touch. (usually);)

I change it a bit if my wife or someone else who needs the kite to be more forgiving is going to be on it. Also if I'm flying an F-Arc the setting are different.

BeamerBob - 20-3-2012 at 01:43 PM

Thanks Mark and Feyd. I understand well about finding the optimal power level for a kite relative to current conditions. I've just never seen anyone else have their trim set up so that the running position was with the bar all the way out. I usually set my trim so that the bar runs at a comfortable distance from me, usually at about 75% in. I didn't at all mean that it was wrong or should be different. Just trying to learn from others when I can.

Feyd - 20-3-2012 at 05:48 PM

No worries Bob.

I wear a seat harness so the reach is good for me. If I wore a waist harness it would definately be an issue. It is interesting to see bar set ups and how they vary from person to person sometimes.

AD72 - 20-3-2012 at 06:08 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by BeamerBobAlso odd with an arc to be able to run with your hand on top. I usually find myself pulling against autozenith on other arcs.


I thought the exact same. I like to ride toeside kitesurfing with one hand on the bar and found it kind of annoying to have to keep tension to prevent the autozenith. I found the Synergy had a strong tendency to autozenith. The Phantom 1 would stay where you put it and the P2 seems to have the same trait. I did not want to try my 9M on the water for fear of bowtie and what the kite did when the lines went slack. What happens with the P2 when the lines go a bit slack? Does it keep the shape or go wet noodle? I really like the red black and white BTW and how the red shows through on the bottom side of the kite. Kind of a more angular venom graphic :thumbup:

I noticed on the PL site the Phantom is not under products for kitesurfing. It does have kitesurfing listed on the infographic.

What do the sizes compare to say a 13M Venom? A 12M or 15M?

Well now that you've seen it...

magictat - 20-3-2012 at 06:48 PM

I predict an increase in future sales. An anonymous source told me you can get custom color arrangement for a fee, and now they are available in an ultra lightweight material. Thanks VO!

I've already uploaded my own phantom image
for my next kite. :roll:

Jen's Pumpkin.jpg - 17kB

One Piece Leading Edge

AD72 - 20-3-2012 at 08:55 PM

From Peterlynn.com Phantom page: "The Leading Edge is designed with a one piece Leading Edge, having less stitches, less drag and more strength"

I have noticed the front edge is a lot smoother in the photos of the Phantom II. You can notice dimpling in the segments of the leading edge on older ARCs. Does this give the ARC a bit more rigid structure in your experience Feyd?

Feyd - 21-3-2012 at 04:23 AM

I can't speak to the option for a super light Arc but I'm sure we all agree it would be pretty sweet.

I know what you guys mean by almost too much Autozenith tendency. The Syn and the Charger both had to be watched a little more closely when on edge and I found I had to do small corrections to keep the kite in position. This kite has less of a tendency and is more like the V2 when on edge.

It's nice.

Does it have more of a rigid structure? That's a tough question. It does seem more rigid visually but I haven't notice a lesser ability to handle gusts which I think would happen if it's more rigid. The leading edge is smoother than previous arcs and the overall profile is comparitively thin.

Sizes compare more like Syns and Chargers. 10m meter Venom would be more like a 12m Phantom 2 in regards to PA and power delivery. The difference is the speed available and turn rate. Though they are essentially the same projected, you can get a lot more out of the available power with the Ph2 IMO. The day I shot that video footage on the 12m I wouldn't have been able to go nearly as well with a 10m V2 even though the projected is about the same.

I'm not clear on Ph2 for water use. I never bothered to ask! It is a "land based" wing but I'm not sure if that means it's not suitable for water. The Scorps were the same idea but there are a few people that ride them on the water all the time. The Phantom 2 holds air 10X better than the Scorp does. I've had her out in the rain and she doesn't get heavy or soak up water, so I don't know why water riding would be an issue.

Unless there is some difference in the construction that meks it more prone to taking on water. I think on the PL site the wheel shows water performance but it shows it in grey.

Not sure what that means:dunno:

Feyd - 21-3-2012 at 04:48 AM

Leading Edge...

P2 front.jpg - 98kB

lad - 21-3-2012 at 08:42 AM

The PII Performance circle has
"Buggying" rated the same as "Kitesurfing"
and they're both rated two blocks BELOW "Landboarding" and "Snowkiting!" (Odd, considering it's said they were inspired by NABX to make a new Phanny!")




I dunno much about kite construction, but this close up of the vent(?) shows a seam along the leading edge(?)


geokite - 21-3-2012 at 11:40 AM

Feyd, are your observations of the turning aspect of the phantom 2 with the VPC bridle on, or direct connection as the website says is an option?

Feyd - 21-3-2012 at 12:57 PM

I have the VPC intact. I really like having a VPC and with my wrist issues I prefer the lighter bar pressure.

That said I would really like to see how she flies sans VPC. I should pull the one off the other 15m and do a side by side comparison shouldn't I?

markite - 21-3-2012 at 02:41 PM

Chris, if you try it, go with the smaller sizes (6/9) those are the sizes that people doing high speed buggying will want the kites to be tracking solid and not as much turning speed.

Feyd - 21-3-2012 at 04:52 PM

I'll have to do the 12m. It's the smallest I have that I have two of.

But I'm very curious about this now.

Feyd - 22-3-2012 at 11:12 AM

I ran a 16" pigtail on the back and the front of the VPC on well, the
front with 2" pigtails (just so I could have a knot). All internals
were set at loose.

The wind was 5-15mph and variable about 220 degrees so it was not an
easy condition to test in but still a good one. I was static flying
BTW.

I can say that the lack of VPC makes the kite rock steady on edge.
Almost F-Arc like even in the dirty winds. Very nice.

Turn rate was still very good. I was actually suprised how good and
the bar pressure was not much more if at all higher than at the VPCs
highest setting.

Power seemed a lot higher. Or at least immediate. I would need to
get her out on the ice to know for sure. Back lines looked good and
plenty slack enough that I don't think they were too tight. I think I
have the pigtails pretty close to where I would like them. Hopefully
I'll get her out on the ice tomorrow (if we have any left, it's near
90f right now) and I'll be able to know for sure if she has more
power.

Depower seemed MAYBE slightly less. Steering slowed a lot more in the
non-vpc Ph2 than the vpc equiped one. Still tolerable and faster than
say a Venom 2

Relaunch was about the same.

My opinion at this point is that removing the VPC turns her into
nearly a completely different wing. Not better, not less good, but
definately different. I liked it very much. Like a Venom 2 on steroids almost. It had a very similar feel to earlier Arcs IMO.

I hope to ride it tomorrow. Winds are going to be in the 20's so it
will be a good day to test it out.

markite - 22-3-2012 at 11:27 AM

thanks, good review - get out and run that baby at some speed now before the ice disappears.

Feyd - 22-3-2012 at 11:45 AM

We might get some gusts over 30mph tomorrow. The big thing will be the surface.

What a crazy season it's been.

I'm super psyched to try it out. I love this kind of stuff!
:wee:

herc - 22-3-2012 at 01:08 PM

chris, more videos ! i really love the one you posted! delivers all the fun of kiting with arcs.
would be nice to see some sequences of launching the new P2 !

btw - is the P2 backward launchable ? if i remember it right, the S-arc was backward launchable like a foil, but othe arcs are not. maybe the p2 got that ability somehow ? not that it would be too important, just curious.

Bladerunner - 22-3-2012 at 04:55 PM

Did you ever try flying your Chargers with VPC removed Chris ?

I always felt that my 10m would have been better with the VPC dropped but traded to a Syn without ever trying???

BeamerBob - 22-3-2012 at 06:38 PM

I was on the phone with Angus as he uncrated boxes from China. 9m, 15, and 18m Phanny IIs are there.

Graphics and colors didn't come up in the conversation. :rolleyes: