Another reason is that a few years ago we showed conclusively that NASA style single skin kites are surprisingly better upwind than I expected
theoretically. NASA's pull very strongly for their size, but don't fly at a very high angle. However, they are the best light wind traction kites
there are; will fly in almost nothing, especially when made of now available lightweight (like 15gm/sq.m) fabrics. We found by repeated comparative
testing using two identical kite cats, that a 20sq.m NASA would always beat a 20sq.m Arc around any upwind/downwind course up to at least 15km/hr true
wind. Which can't be true but is. The technical term for this is cognitive dissonance- things that our rationalising brain structures cause us to
ignore because they don't align with our general world view. But facts are facts whether we agree with them or not, and this is a fact that I've begun
to like so much that in this case I'm going to change my mind and accept. Because it's a partial answer to the light wind problem for kite sailing.
The rest of the answer is maybe to chooses windier places to sail. |