Power Kite Forum

Hardwater Kiting long term snowkite review of the Flysurfer Peak.

 Pages:  1  

Feyd - 4-8-2014 at 07:09 AM

Here in Northern New England we have gusty winds. The average gust factor on any given day is usually double the baseline wind speed so if it's blowing 15kts we get gusts in the 30kt range. These are standard wind conditions and they really force you to choose kites that have great gust handling and depower properties. As you can imagine this makes for a shallow pool of options if you want it to find kites that don't beat you up so low AR "touring" style kites are usually the "go to" option.

Hardwater Kiting (www.hardwaterkiter.com) picked up the 6 and 9m Peaks back in December as part of our demo kite inventory. Our initial impressions, based on photos of the kites, was that they would be a issue in the occasional conditions where bridles kites get snagged on rough frozen surfaces and the Lack of bottom skin and the long thin bridles just screamed "snag me!".

To be honest, they can become a mess if you make the mistake of landing the kite on some frozen slush snowmobile tracks. But after a season of multiple kiters flying the heck out of these kites we have found they aren't prone to snagging any more than any other bridled kite. This was a pleasant surprise and Peak has actually turned out to be one of our most popular offerings, especially to our customers looking for their first depower kite.



The Peak for novice/intermediate snowkiters.

First, why do we feel the Peak a great kite for this segment of snowkiters? To put it simply the Peak is really the best of many worlds. Think of what you would get if a Foil and SLE inflatable had a baby. From a depower point of view the only kites that depower as well and as quickly in our opinion are SLE inflatable kites. There are a lot of kites out there that have great depow range but the immediate depower available, the ability to dump all the power in an SLE is really amazing. The Peak depows the same way. Like many kites when things get nasty, let the bar out but unlike many kites, the Peak dumps nearly 100% of its power. We try to explain to our students and customers how the wing dumps so much power so fast but if you don't get to see or try it firsthand it's really a little hard to believe.

Nobody really understands it until they get to try it.

This ability to dump power so quickly has made the Peak an excellent tool for getting some of our more conservative students to the next level. Students and riders worried about being overpowered and constantly wanting to rig a kite too small. The PeaS-P-A-M-L-I-N-K-s depow range allows them to really explore and test the waters of being fully powered. It gives them the confidence to try a kite in the appropriate power range even if they go back to a more traditional foil. This season we saw the Peak move a lot of "perpetual intermediate" kiters into more of an advanced level of riding. The Peak is a huge confidence builder for intermediates and beginners.

From a novice/intermediated riders "ease of use" point of view the Peak really shines. Simple to fly, simple to depow, simple to pack up and unpack. No cells to over pressure and blow out. Of course no pumps or bladders. Lays on the ice much like a Paraski Flex. Reverse launches better than any other kites we had in our school or demo inventory this season. In my opinion it reverse launches better than any kite we've ever flown. Flags out beautifully when the safety is released, reloads and relaunches with ease. No "mechanical" trim system beyond shortening or lengthening the center leader from "Freeride" (which we found not much fun most of the time) and "Tour" (Which we pretty much have the kites set at 99.9% of the time). All the kiter has to do is fly and sheet in or out as need be. Only occasionally did anyone ever have an issue and it was usually due to the kite rolling on the surface while not being flown and a bridle would fall behind the kite and cause a bowtie on launch. In reality this is easy to avoid by simply paying attention while the kite is on the ground.

Also if you ride in an environment like ours where "Hot" launch is actually the safest way to get up and out into smoother winds away from shoreline turbulence. In hot launches the Peak is unmatched.

The Peak for advanced/expert snowkiters.

If you know anything about backcountry or Alpine Tour skiing, Flysurfer designed the Peak in much of the same design philosophy as a Dynafit designed their alpine touring system. Bare bones, uber light weight, super simple. The wind ranges listed on the Flysurfer site are in our opinion a bit conservative as we have found that the Peaks have a much higher top end than Flysurfer states but the ranges are kind of a "moving target".

Comparisons like "the 6m pulls like a 9m" can be either be considered understated or overstated depending on the surface conditions and the rider's weight and pilot skill. And though it's true the Peak will fly in 4kts it's not likely to pull you in that wind if you have anything but clean ice underfoot and even then you will have to work it to get it going and build some apparent wind. That said we have come up with some simple mods that really broaden the wind range of both sizes but that's for another write up.

How they tour and transport.

From a snowkiting set up and pack down perspective the Peak single skins are to traditional open cell foils what open cells are to LEIs. Easier to use and transport-the 6m and 9m complete, 2 kites, bars and lines will fit in an 8m open cell foil kite pack with room for extra clothing, climbing skins and food but as you usually have one wing in the air and one on your back there's even more room. The 6m will fit in a medium size hydration pack with the bar and lines. The 9m RTF with the bag and repair kite/owner's manual, weighs the same as an 8.5m HQ Apex 4 KO. If you are an occasional snowkiter that likes to get out once or twice a season and ride short distances near your launch area these aren't really great benefits. For those of us who like to fly long distance and do 70-100 mile day tours these details are pretty damn cool.

Steering and handling.

Both the 6m and 9m come with the same length bar. On the surface the bar seems short but in use it works fine for both sizes. Steering pressure is medium and the feel is nice and direct. There is a period of getting used to the flutter that the kite produces when depowered but in time you learn to ignore it and after a while you don't even notice it. Turn rate can be cheated by over the bar steering if need be and the kite can actually be reverse steered or spun by tail stalling one side. Some of our riders have experience with stunt kites and they say the Peak actually flies a lot like those kites. In the right hands it really does amazing things.


Power and Depower.

The instant and immediate power/depower range of these kites make them really shine on large lake and alpine environments. Obviously in an alpine environment where you are using a kite to climb, there is sometimes an issue with the broad wind range from the bottom of a climb up higher where you get into the compression gradient at the ridgeline. Sometimes you're underpowered at the bottom of the ridge, limping and looping your way up only to find yourself overpowered or borderline OP'd at the ridgeline in addition to the risk of getting lofted. The Peaks almost completely eliminate a much of this risk and really open up areas that for many years we felt were not worth the risk to fly in. The same goes for long excursions where the wind you find yourself in 20 miles from your launch is often not the same wind you started in. In both cases, change of wind due to locations or due to gradient, even if it gets to the point that you do have to swap wings, they are so small and light you don't really mind carrying the extra wing.

Advanced riders will find there is a lot of overlap between the 6 and 9m. The 6m has been by far the most popular kite we've sold to our students and customers as it really does pull much like an 8 or 9m open cell but it depows to about the same as an un-trimmed 3-4m open cell. The 9m pulls much like an 11-12m open cell and depows to about the same as a 5m un-trimmed open cell. This said, if you put a 5m line extension set on the 9m and have a low resistance surface the 9m can go head to head, can in some cases outperform it's Speed 3.5 15m brother in light winds. In low winds a 145lb kiter will have roughly the same power on the 9m Peak as a 200 lb kiter does on a 19m Psycho 4 SA DLX. And what it lacks in low end grunt it makes up with turn rate in comparison to the bigger kites.

We have found the Peak provides roughly the same wind range for advance riders as 2 traditional open cell depowerable kites. And as most traditional depowers cover the wind ranges of 2 or 3 fixed bridle kites the economics of flying Peaks is really good.

As far as high winds go we have had the 6m in winds in excess of 40mph and found it surprisingly manageable for advance riders and we even saw some fairly new (2 yrs of snowkite experience) riders actually having fun on the 6m in 30mph+ winds. Winds that they would have struggle with on smaller depower kites. We've seen the 6m pulling riders at speeds beyond 60mph.

Mid-season last winter while doing a demo we had two expert riders doing a tour to the north end of one of the larger lakes we frequent. Round trip is about 25 miles with the most technical aspect of this trip being a 1/2 long narrow tree lined cut that in a West wind a dead zone apart from the occasional rotor/gust that you can hook into and limp through on. We had a straight West that day. The kiter on the 6m was 210lbs,was on the 6m Peak Demo the other, 165lbs on a 12m Speed 3.5 SA. The 6m rider found his way fairly easily as he was able to throw the 6m around to keep it powered in the dead spots and able to quickly reposition it where it needed to be for a given wind situation. The 12m, even though slightly more powerful and piloted by a lighter rider, lacked the ability to maneuver and take advantage of the limited opportunities to get good power and get through the dead spots. The kiter on the Peak made the 25 mile out and back trip. The 12m Speed rider turned back as the winds were getting lighter and he couldn't get through the cut. We were really blown away by this and it really illustrated to us the potential of these kites.

Launching and landing.

In our local snowkite community we feel strongly that as snowkiters we have to be self sufficient and keep reliance on others to a minimum. Self launching and landing in these parts is the general rule and when touring it's a mandatory requirement. The Peak is super fast to set up and launch. Faster than any kite we've ever flown. There are ways to pack it that make it deploy even faster, basically the time it takes to unwrap your lines and hook in, but they rely on special packing procedure. From a packing/unpacking standpoint our only complaint is that unlike most kites the Peak lacks a strap to keep the wing secured when unwrapping lines during set up or pack down phases. It's not a requirement but we strongly recommend using a strap with these kites. It makes life a bit easier if the wind is nukin'.

The Peaks (to our surprise) can be "Ghost Launched" if need be. A prime situation would be where you are on glass ice with no way to secure the wing to the surface or if you have to land in an emergency and have no way to secure the wing. We're sure Flysurfer would probably frown on it but you can secure the chicken loop to your ice screw and either hot launch or edge of window launch completely unassisted. If "Ghost Launching" we recommend edge window launch.

You can also "Ghost Land" (see pic at bottom). If you want to ghost land it you fly to the edge of the window, secure the chicken loop to your anchor, disconnect yourself from the kite, approach the kite from the up wind side, grab the ground/ice level wingtip and simply walk it toward the anchor. The kite flags, pack the wing and wrap your lines. It's very easy as the Peaks are very good and just bouncing at the edge of the window when you want to stop and land or take a break.

The Peak can also be landed in traditional ways such as grabbing the back lines and tail stalling or flagging the kite out either manually or via the safety system. It does not have a rear cross over brake line.

Jumping and Freestyle.

Although the Peak is a lower AR touring kite designed to offer minimal lift and is not designed for freestyle type riding many have found that the Peak not only jumps but it actually has a very "Flysurfer" floaty feel in jumps. The timing is a little different than you would find in a freestyle based kite but it's manageable and actually really nice. The direct feel in the steering is also there when sheeting in or out while jumping. In the event that a jump is going badly it is very easy to reduce lift fairly precisely if needed. The turn rate, even with the bars as short as they are, is fast enough to allow kite loops in higher winds.


Build Quality and Durability.

Build quality is much like what you expect from Flysurfer, obviously at a lower dollar amount than the brand's pricier offerings. When you open the kite up for the first time nothing about it screams "budget" kite.

From a durability standpoint we've found the kite by and large is tough as nails. On the surface it seems like it would be prone to damage but in practice it has proven to be able to handle everything we see here in New England. The only issues we've seen were due mostly to pilot error, mostly from dragging the kite leading edge down and wearing into the fabric on the leading edge stiffeners and one instance where one of the stiffeners came out due to a bad stitch which was a warranty issue and Flysurfer dealt with it quickly and satisfactorily.

Otherwise the build quality and durability is first rate.

As with most kites there is a ton more we could go into but it would equate to writing a small novel. Bottom line is this kite is unlike anything we've ever seen. The 6m has been the more popular seller for us and is easily the most versatile for most people's needs. Really a great kite.

There it is in a nutshell. This is one of a series of reviews that I'm trying to catch up on now that I can type.:smilegrin: Stay tuned for more.


Snapshot - 122b.jpg - 215kB

GOPR0528.jpg - 136kB IMAG1179.jpg - 225kB

Proletariat - 4-8-2014 at 09:06 AM

Awesome review, Chris. I was wondering how these things did in our gnarly wind conditions.

metajack - 4-8-2014 at 09:28 AM

Thanks for this great review. I've had my eye on a set of these ever since you posted that teaser video a while back.

The kites are beautiful and the single skin design seems like a great idea that hopefully will gain more traction.

Feyd - 4-8-2014 at 09:36 AM

Thanks.

Works well in here in the mountains and tree lined lakes. My guess is it would work out in your neck of the woods too.

Here's the link to the vid I made from some footage . At the end it demonstrates a Ghost landing. In case anyone's missed it.


http://youtu.be/ziI6hs1co48?list=UU8RK0aY462-E5dDCzEWfZNw

Cheddarhead - 4-8-2014 at 11:54 AM

Very nice detailed review Chris!


Proletariat - 4-8-2014 at 12:37 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Cheddarhead  
Very nice detailed review Chris! I think Flysurfer would be proud of the work you did:cool:



Was that a veiled threat that you're going to report him to Flysurfer? :)

Cheddarhead - 4-8-2014 at 02:15 PM

No way, no how, no sir. I would NEVER do that. I am not implying anything. I just thought Chris's review really highlighted what a great product they have is all. If I was Flysurfer I would be happy about the rave review he gave the Peak. In an indirect way, Chris is promoting what a great power kite the Peak is. I think it came out wrong.....been known to happen.

John Holgate - 4-8-2014 at 03:35 PM

That's one of the best reviews I've read. Many thanks!!

kiteballoon - 4-8-2014 at 04:12 PM

Lovely review Chris. If there's anyone in the thread who doesn't now want to fly / own one they didn't read your post :-)

I'm curious what applications you don't think the kite is well suited for. Or features of the kite you don't like if any. It sounds a lot like it's the ultimate kite for snowkite touring, would you do other land based powerkiting with it? Concrete and objective comparisons with kites you normally use would be helpful. The story of one rider getting stuck vs the other completing the lake tour with the peak is an example. More details along those lines please ;-)

Bladerunner - 4-8-2014 at 04:34 PM

I wonder if a simple loop sewn onto the bag and a kite screw wouldn't be a solution to the high wind clean ice launch issues ?
You could then launch straight out of the bag like the do in this video.
http://vimeo.com/78772663

3shot - 4-8-2014 at 05:39 PM

Great review Feyd :cool: :thumbup:

lunchbox - 4-8-2014 at 08:40 PM

Wow....talk about setting the bar on kite reviews :thumbup:

Would love to demo one for my conditions. Any chance on getting a 9 sent to L.A. I of course will pay shipping back and forth and leave a deposit if necessary...

PHREERIDER - 5-8-2014 at 03:42 PM

nie stuff!

B-Roc - 5-8-2014 at 06:50 PM

Nice review.

Kober - 5-8-2014 at 07:37 PM

Chris .... we need more people like you ..... this review is awesome ..... I wish my english is better ... I would contribute some reviews too ...

Proletariat - 5-8-2014 at 08:52 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Cheddarhead  
No way, no how, no sir. I would NEVER do that. I am not implying anything. I just thought Chris's review really highlighted what a great product they have is all. If I was Flysurfer I would be happy about the rave review he gave the Peak. In an indirect way, Chris is promoting what a great power kite the Peak is. I think it came out wrong.....been known to happen.


Naw man, I was just ribbin' ya... I need a better /sarcasm emoticon :)

Totally a great review... even if I'm now a little pissed at Chris for adding Peak considerations to my wild vacillations between next-kite-purchase-preferences.

Sooooo... 9m Peak or 15m Speed 3? I kinda struggle with the 15m in Colorado garbage winds, which is what makes me think the Peak might be just lovely. But then I think... "wait a minute... SPEED for a PEAK?!?!?! What am I crazy?!?!" Then I go back and read Chris's review and think... the Peak might be just lovely and the whole cycle starts over again. I'm in kite-indecision purgatory thanks to you and your hard water kiting ways... :)

BeamerBob - 6-8-2014 at 07:37 AM

You increased my interest level with the speeds over 60 and depower range. I hope to get to try one someday. Oh, probably the best kite review I've read in years. At least on par with tridude.

skimtwashington - 6-8-2014 at 02:17 PM



What can you say about such a kite...and such a review, both?

Impressive.


ssayre - 6-8-2014 at 03:22 PM


Quote:

You increased my interest level with the speeds over 60 and depower range. I hope to get to try one someday. Oh, probably the best kite review I've read in years. At least on par with tridude.



BB, would you say it "Peaked" your interest?

Edit: Sorry, dumb joke, carry on. Great review Feyd.

BeamerBob - 6-8-2014 at 10:05 PM

Quote: Originally posted by ssayre  

Quote:

You increased my interest level with the speeds over 60 and depower range. I hope to get to try one someday. Oh, probably the best kite review I've read in years. At least on par with tridude.



BB, would you say it "Peaked" your interest?

Edit: Sorry, dumb joke, carry on. Great review Feyd.

I keep getting more and more interested! So yes my interest is "peaked" again. :P

madday92 - 7-8-2014 at 05:49 AM

If I had read this review before I finally decided to get a Peak, I probably would have gotten one several weeks earlier! :lol:

Proletariat - 7-8-2014 at 07:57 AM

Madday... Would you choose a peak over a speed 3 for inland?

MeatÐriver - 7-8-2014 at 09:39 AM

Question for you Feyd.... I'm hearing a lot of "pros" regarding this kite, are there any real "cons" that you/others have experienced. I have heard a few disappointed with the fact that when the bar is cranked hard to the side it binds on the chicken line restricting de/powerability.

Also, how is the upwind? Any kite you can compare it to

madday92 - 7-8-2014 at 10:31 AM

Quote:
Madday... Would you choose a peak over a speed 3 for inland?


Unfortunately I have never flown a speed 3. So I don't believe I am the best person to answer this question.

Anyone else feel better suited to answer this?

Feyd - 8-8-2014 at 05:56 AM

Real quick...

Of the Speed series the Speed 3 and above variations have been the best gust handling Speeds.

Historically, there have been days with earlier models where some of the local Flysurfer riders get done for the day and have exclaimed that they have never been so happy to get off the kite. Meanwhile those of us flying Arcs hardly noticed the gust factor at all. Depow and gust handling are what made Arc's so popular with the more dedicated riders in our area.

The Peak is the first kite we've seen that comes close to an Arc's ability to handle gusty inland conditions. And as improved as the Speeds are now they don't handle the gusty nearly as well as the Peak nor do they dump power as quickly. The Speed is going to be a better option in terms of going upwind and flying on water but if looking for ease of use and handling in nasty conditions I would rather be on a Peak myself. Easier on the body and let's face it easier on the wallet.

As far as "Cons" go, I'm honestly having a hard time coming up with any worth mentioning. I suppose the occasional line wrapping behind the wing that I mentioned earlier could be one. Kites with both skins are less prone to this and easier to untangle. Sometimes if you don't know which side got wrapped you pull the wrong one then end up disconnecting the kite to fix it. Not major but a pain if it's nukin'.

The potential for excessive wear on the leading edge. Snow can be extremely abrasive and if the kite is down on it's leading edge and dragged at all you can wear through the fabric that retains the leading edge stringers causing them to be exposed or worse pop out. On our demos I placed extra material on these potential high wear areas and have had no issues. As long as you're mindful it's an easy problem to avoid.

The snag factor in frozen slush is pretty substantial but not much more if at all than any other kites with bridles. I ride Arc's primarily so bridles aren't an issue for me and I forget what a pain bridles can be when they snag. Again, not sure if it's a "con" but just something to note.

Under full depower in high winds the kite nearly folds in half. It actually flies and turns well but if you look at it you'll cringe at the site of it. From an inexperienced spectators view, it just looks broken. The best solution I've come up with is simply don't look at it under heavy depow. Just be happy it's flying and not trying to kill you because the winds picked up.

I have not experienced any binding issues sheeting in and out with heavy steering. As there can be a lot of sheeting in days with high gust frequency there can be substantial wear on the center leader and maybe these individuals have enough wear on the line that it binds up? After a season here our wear is pretty acceptable and does not hinder the sheeting action. Now if we're talking in terms where you have the bar turned like you would in a kite loop then maybe I can see it binding some but I feel most bars bind in that situation to some point.

As a general rule I never buy the first release of anything. I wait till some bugs are worked out in the real world and go for the second or third series. But I have to say Flysurfer is really onto something here. Other brands should take note. I'm the first to admit when I saw the initial photos I though this kite was some kind of joke. I was very very wrong. Some people disregard the kite, say that it doesn't do as advertised or that it's just not much of a kite to fly.

All I can say is those people aren't flying it correctly.

This kite is in standard material and its and extremely versatile wing. A UL version, maybe in a 12-15m would be an unstoppable light wind engine.

A smaller 4m version would be an unbelievable high wind wing. Also a great teaching kite. We used these kites in a few lessons but are hesitant to use something like this exclusively as these kites lack many of the technical features our students will encounter out in the world on their own. However the students that want to make post lesson purchases are often attracted to the Peak 6m as their first kite purchase. With it's wind range and ease of use it really is an excellent option.


All we do is snowkite here and we have developed a good grasp on what works and what doesn't in a situation in the last 12 yrs. In an environment where you have to be self sufficient and you know you have no vehicle support to haul your butt home, The Peak is an absolute killer choice.










Proletariat - 9-8-2014 at 11:27 PM

Quote: Originally posted by Feyd  
From an inexperienced spectators view, it just looks broken. The best solution I've come up with is simply don't look at it under heavy depow.


Actual LOL here from that sentence. Thanks again, Feyd, once you started comparing it to the arcs, you had me. I love the arcs for gust absorption and general ease of use, but our wind directions are stupid-variable here, so the arc isn't a viable option if you don't want early grey hairs.

Man, I really want to demo one of these. I don't suppose FS would start a "Pass the Peak" program, would they? :)

Also, check out these nice boosts in relatively light wind... this was my concern, but it looks pretty floaty and smoov:



Proletariat - 17-8-2014 at 08:30 PM

There... Happy, Chris? My Peak is on order. You are an agent of disruption, damn you :)

MeatÐriver - 17-8-2014 at 09:22 PM

You do know this means we will be expecting a review from you at your soonest possible convenience, right?:thumbup:

Proletariat - 18-8-2014 at 01:20 PM

Totes. It ships tomorrow, so hopefully here by Friday, which I happen to have off. It'll be a buggy situation since my leg is still in heal-mode, but it'll be a review nonetheless.

soliver - 18-8-2014 at 05:30 PM

SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET.... can't wait to see him at JIBE!!

robinsonpr - 26-10-2014 at 01:50 AM

Sorry for hijacking the thread guys but I found this review awesome!

Quote:

I love the arcs for gust absorption and general ease of use, but our wind directions are stupid-variable here, so the arc isn't a viable option if you don't want early grey hairs.


Proletariat can you elaborate on this comment about arcs please?

Reason I ask is I am a beginner landboarder with a Venom 13m and a Synergy 15m but they have scared me and I am looking for something smaller and more manageable. But bigger than my 3m Twister I used for getting started. I was Considering something like 8m Apex but a reply to my other post here got me researching the Flysurfer Peak as something that might work for me.

I guess I would be looking at the 6m Peak for my weight 175 lbs and skill level beginner. Winds 10mph but inland and pretty variable.

I got arcs because of what folk said about their ability to handle inland and gusty conditions but I've really struggled with my arcs. Is the Peak likely to be a better option for me?

Feyd - 26-10-2014 at 06:18 PM

Arcs are consummate gust handlers. But as a beginner there is a pretty substantial learning curve to fly them effectively and with confidence. One you get a handle on flying them they are extremely nice kites with versatility to match.

The Peak on the other hand is very user friendly and easy to fly compared to Arcs. And set up and break down is much easier. Gust handling is near arc-like and depower is very close as well.

Whoever lead you to arcs were correct in regards to the handling of dirty winds and flight quality. But if you are unfamiliar with some of the little things that make flying arcs a bit easier, they can be a lesson in frustration.


robinsonpr - 27-10-2014 at 02:31 AM

Thanks for that Feyd! I think my problem with arcs is certainly the learning curve and also a major confidence issue, especially now having sustained an injury. Right now I don't even want to get them out the bag! I'm certainly unfamiliar with any of the little things that make flying arcs easier, though I think I've finally got self-launching dialled.

The Peak is looking like a very likely purchase for me. Am I right in thinking the 6m would be my best option given my skill level? I read that the 9m can pull like a 14-15m foil which sounds way too much.

Can a comparison be made between the 6m Peak and something like an 8m HQ Apex (which is what I was looking at before I stumbled across the Peak)? In terms of user friendliness, suitability for beginner landboarder, handling of variable winds...?

erratic winds - 27-10-2014 at 07:06 AM

Robinsonpr- Arcs have a very steep starting learning curve then get very easy, kind of like snowboarding! ;)


Feyd - 27-10-2014 at 07:13 AM

HAHAH that's actually a very good comparison EW.;)

Feyd - 27-10-2014 at 07:31 AM

As it happens Molly and I were discussing this last night. There was a session we had last winter with another local rider on one of the bigger lakes in the region doing a tour in some fairly stout winds. Molly hadn't at that time logged much time on the Peak and really I hadn't either but I used the trip as a chance to feel it out some more. Molly @ 130-140lbs (posting my wife's weight on the interwebs uh oh) opted to take the 5m Apex 4. Me @ 200-210lbs on the 6m Peak and our friend at about 160-170 lbs on the 8m FS Psycho 4.

We rode a few hours and the winds picked up a bit from when we started. Molly had her 5m half trimmed and was working pretty hard, our friend was fully trimmed on the 8m P4 with it nearly directly overhead most of the time and I was happy as can be and not even close to overpow'd unless I sheeted in fully. All of us are experienced snowkiters. I could see clearly that the amount of power/depower was considerable compared to the other kites out there.

The 6m Peak will power you more than the Apex 8m but will depower even more than a 5m Apex and turn better than the Apex in the depowered state. Molly said it best last night. "The Peak makes some traditional depowers obsolete as depowers made fixed bridles obsolete." HEHEHE The fixed bridle buggy guys may take issue with that but keep in mind we're talking snowkite here. :D

ssayre - 27-10-2014 at 07:56 AM

At the price and performance of the peak I'm not sure why anyone would look at traditional open cell (except for a good deal used)? Is there any advantages at all?

Feyd - 27-10-2014 at 10:01 AM

This has been a common question with our beginner students. We teach on Apex 4's primarily and similar kites because they have traits that are common to many different brands and designs of open cell foils. But often after a they complete their lessons they try one of our Peak demos and immediately fall recognize how easy they are to fly and manage and they ask the very same question, why would I fly a more traditional design? Especially given the benefits in light of the cost?

The Peak is awesome for sure for all the reasons we've covered and more. For 90% of what your average user is going to want it's really a great choice and one that's hard to beat. But the flight quality is different than what the dual skin equivalents can offer. It is a dyed in the wool snowkite touring machine IMO and as such will never (in it's current design) provide some users with the performance needed to do certain things. Take jumping for example. Sure, the Peak jumps and jumps pretty well for a kite with minimal lift but it's never going to jump like A Ozone Summit or HQ Montana 8. Advanced riders will be able to squeeze more performance out of the Peak than the average user but it wouldn't be as ideal as other more high performance based designs.

Would I course race on a Peak against the Speed 4 or Chrono? No. That would be terrible, like racing my Chargers against Elfs it wouldn't even be close. Would I race long distance in nasty variable conditions on a Peak against the same? Hell yes. Because that's where it's strengths lie.

The Peak does what it does very well. Other kites we had in demo like the Matrixx, Summit and Access last year did what they did very well also. The 2014 Access was nearly as good as the Peak in many of the same ways but it fell short in regards to the amount of depow, pack ability, set up and break down speed. It was close but not quite. The quality of flight of the Access is better, especially with the lack of depow flutter and turn rate was a bit better. It handles gust amazingly well too and the 2015 will be even closer in performance with the new safety but it can't compete on price.

Really it comes down to what the buyer is attracted to. The Peak is a great kite and for the money you can't beat it. I think the Peak has more potential of an impact on beginner new kite sales and older used kites than current inline or even a year old but new kite sales. If I'm looking for the performance of a Charger 2 I'm not going to find in by saving $$$ on a Peak.


We sold a Frenzy UL last season. The guy was torn between it and the 9m Peak. He settled on the Frenzy because he wanted high performance more than seemingly unlimited depow. He got a great kite, light weight so added low wind capability and easy to pack and carry. It's really a best of both worlds option.

The question we really have to ask is what if they start producing hi performance hi AR versions. Peter Lynn (himself) had mentioned seeing a hi AR single skin in one of his newsletters. He seemed pretty impressed by what he saw and nobody is letting on who made the thing. Kites are expensive. If there could be a more affordable single skin kite out there that can do what the current premium model dual skins can due for less I think it will open up kiting to more people. I think the trend of producing Dr./Lawyer kites is not sustainable or good for the long run.

There's still a place for Dual skin open cells and closed cells especially in snowkiting. But the Peak design is really a great amount of performance and versatility for the money.

robinsonpr - 27-10-2014 at 10:44 AM

Feyd - the comments about the Peak powering more than an Apex 8m and also depower more than a 5m Apex have really tipped the scales for me, I'm almost ready to pull the pin on the credit card!

The dealer I've been talking to is pushing the Ozone Access 8m as the ideal "first" depower kite for my scenario. Not sure if that's because it's the best choice though, or if it's because they want to get rid of the Access's they have in stock...I noticed there is a 2015 Access now and the one he's trying to sell me is a 2013. They have got the Access 2013 discounted at £700 instead of £850, but that's STILL more expensive than the Peak which is £675.

They say the Access is hands down better than the HQ Apex and the PL Lynx, especially in ground handling and safety. But they are pretty quiet about the Peak, not sure if that's because they don't know much about it or because they don't make as much on it!

The Peak is beginning to sound like a no-brainer to me at this stage, I'm always wary of dealers especially when it comes to unloading last season's gear.

[Edit I just read your last reply which mentions the Access also! Given they are trying to sell me a 2013 Access, is the Peak the better option in your opinion?]

ssayre - 27-10-2014 at 11:24 AM

The advice you get here is better than anywhere. Good luck!

robinsonpr - 27-10-2014 at 01:14 PM

Yeah this forum is awesome!

Anyone ever experienced this issue with the Peak?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ6ALx-DbSc

What ARE those stiffner things in the leading edge? Bra cup underwires? Are they metal? Does that affect pack down, have you got to be really careful to not squash or bend them??

Feyd - 27-10-2014 at 02:07 PM

That would be a potential downside to the Peak or any other kite with leading edge stiffeners vs. a traditional open cell. If the kite gets dragged leading edge down eventually there's going to be wear on the leading edge where the stringers are stitched in, essentially causing a stress riser in regards to fabric wear. We actually put some extra protection in the form of ripstop repair tape on the areas that we thought might be an issue on our demos to avoid what was shown in the video. I haven't seen wear quite that bad from grass or snow. Pavement will burn it quick though.

I'm told the stringers are made of monofilament, essentially fishing line. Very resilient and flexible. Ozone has multiple layers on the stringers of the Chrono, probably to avoid exactly this sort of damage.

This doesn't happen to traditional open cells but in general I try not to let my kite drag leading edge down if I can help it. :D

robinsonpr - 28-10-2014 at 06:23 AM

I'm almost set to buy the Peak 6m :D

One other thing I wanted to ask...is the trekking backpack they advertise with it any good? I figure I'd have to get a rucksack of some sort for it anyway as it only comes with a stuff sack, right? And my harness (an old Mystic Warrior waist/seat harness) is pretty bulky to be lugging about just for a session cruising (NOT jumping!) about on a landboard.

Also in the field I use some guys have had gear stolen so I prefer to keep everything on me.

Looks like a pretty neat idea, IF it's functional. Think it's worth the $$$?

Thanks,
Paul

soliver - 28-10-2014 at 07:14 AM

If you're thinking of changing harnesses and the PeaS-P-A-M-L-I-N-K-s backpack harness isn't an option, I'd recommend the Peter Lynn Divine harness. It's a seat harness, fairly light weight and super comfortable. Not big and bulky at all.

Feyd - 28-10-2014 at 09:56 AM

I agree that the Divine is a comfortable harness as harness's go but you'll need to find one with a non-buggy spreader bar.

The Peak pack is a nice option for light duty snowkite/power kiting but it's not really intended to do more than allow you to hook in for low key riding or ascending and giving you a place to store your kites while riding or just in general.

We've sold a few packs but most of our customers opt for the Ozone SB if comfort and light weight are the goal in addition to being a harness that can handle some pretty substantial loading and still have lots of support. AND YOU CAN WEAR ANY PACK YOU WANT WITH IT. So you aren't limited by the size of the Peak Pack. Your Mystic is pretty bulky to shoe horn into the Peak Pack. The Ozone dang near fits into a large shoe box.

The 6m will fit into any pack that the bar and lines will fit into. I often carry our 6m demo in a Marmot hydration pack. Follow the link below and watch the video to see the size of the pack.

http://www.hardwaterkiter.com/flysurfer-peak-click.html

With careful packing you can squeeze the Peaks into some damn small spots :D.



robinsonpr - 28-10-2014 at 01:16 PM

I wish this was an easier decision.... Spoke to a distributor that does Flysurfer and Ozone and they were also pushing me towards the Access, said the Peak was less versatile, less user friendly and couldn't be used in higher winds.

They said the Peak was an awesome kite, but just suited to certain application, such as lighter winds. They also said the depower on the Peak isn't as effective as a traditional foil because there's no air pressure inside to keep the shape.

I'm a right Mr Confused now! :o

MeatÐriver - 28-10-2014 at 03:42 PM

That's funny.... all I've heard about the Peak is that it is very "bow/SLE like" in terms of its depower, which modern traditional foils just can't match. And I've just sort of ignorantly assumed that the high level of depower had something to do with the fact that it didn't need to maintain that internal pressure.:puzzled:

ssayre - 28-10-2014 at 09:24 PM


Quote:

"The Peak makes some traditional depowers obsolete as depowers made fixed bridles obsolete." HEHEHE The fixed bridle buggy guys may take issue with that but keep in mind we're talking snowkite here. :D


Here's a video of a peter lynn guy making fb on snow look awesome. Chris, you might want to rethink your opinion of fb on snow :P

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNPGqdT25bw

Feyd - 29-10-2014 at 05:38 AM

Ssayre, clearly the guy knows how to ride. You can tell simply by his body positioning. And he knows how to work that Vapor. But look at where they're riding, he's playing somewhere that has smooth consistent winds and he's not venturing far from the camera. He's not 30 miles out from the launch and in winds gusting from 10kt to 22kts. I suspect that he wouldn't be riding like that in our local spots here.

I'm not a FB hater guys. (neither is Molly BTW) Pound for pound, FB is the biggest bang for the buck power wise and there's some value there for the rider that is in a place where distance and gust factor aren't an issue. I love that direct feel and sense of raw power. And on handles, oh man the things you can do when a kite is on handles! For years I considered getting a 16m Vapor for my light wind kite but never did because it would be impractical given are usual wind conditions, even in light wind.

The reality is you can fly any kite in any environment. You can fly a Vapor on water if you want. Heck as we know back in the day water riders rode FB kites but they adopted depower pretty fast when it became available and they don't have nearly the gust factor that inland riders have. Track down some threads in the forums from around 2000-2002 and you'll see they had the same discussion that we are having now.

Which is why, from a rider that gave up on FB almost 11yrs ago I'm perplexed that so few riders in the buggy world have adopted depows or are just now starting to experiment with them. But I'm not a buggy driver, I have no experience in it and there may be something I'm not aware of. But I am a snowkiter and I will say that sure, I could ride fixed bridles here but it wouldn't be fun and in some situations it could be dangerous.

Depower kites like the Peter Lynn Phantom 2, The Flysurfer Peak, Ozone Access and others are simply much more practical when you have a 50-100% gust factor. Even more so when you have a high gust frequency as well. This said, not all depowers share this versatility. The Flysurfer Speed used to be such a kite. On gusty days some of the most experienced riders would ride the thing but at the end of the day would complain about how beat up they got in the gusts. Meanwhile someone on a Synergy would have hardly noticed the gust factor.

The new Speeds, light years away from that now.

Either way, the boosts that guy is getting on the Vapor look sweet and smooth.

But back to Robinsonpr's dilemma.

"Spoke to a distributor that does Flysurfer and Ozone and they were also pushing me towards the Access, said the Peak was less versatile, less user friendly and couldn't be used in higher winds.

They said the Peak was an awesome kite, but just suited to certain application, such as lighter winds. They also said the depower on the Peak isn't as effective as a traditional foil because there's no air pressure inside to keep the shape."

My question at this point would be how much actually riding time do any of these people have on the kites we're comparing here? One of the biggest key elements of the PeaS-P-A-M-L-I-N-K-s design philosophy is ease of use. Our beginner students love the things! Fear is probably the biggest limiter to a rider's progression and the Peak takes a lot of fear out of the equation which frees up our students to focus on the act of riding and learning and less on the fear. To be able to immediately dump power on the fly without the need for mechanical trim is a huge benefit. There are a lot of riders out there that were perpetual intermediates that were given the confidence to ride in winds beyond their comfort zone and moved to the next level by simply being put on the Peak.

High winds. My experience, watch the beginning segment of this video.

http://youtu.be/ziI6hs1co48

There are some pics of the Peak on our site that I took the first time I took the 6m in high winds. We often fly kites beyond the manufacture's wind ranges because on ice we can. Bear in mind I'm an experienced rider but I was in winds gusting to 45kts and was comfortable enough on the thing to set it at the edge of the window and take some pics with my cell phone. Hands off the bar. There isn't another kite in our inventory that I could have or would have done that with. That day was the day I was sold on the potential of this design.

Furthermore, here's Flysurfer's statement direct from their website. "The PEAK is super easy to handle even in extreme low wind conditions allowing you to get going earlier. However the PEAK is also easy to control in strong winds due to the direct and effective depower." And this "Super simple and easy handling makes it ideal for children or beginners." I don't generally buy into the manufacture's copy on their product, I like to find out for myself, but the Peak has proven to be everything they described.

And saying the depower isn't as effective due to the lack of cells? What is going to dump power better a flag or a rigid wing? As I've stated before, after the first time I rode a SLE inflatable I felt that the depower available on foils, as good as it is on some, isn't nearly what the SLE has to offer. In my discipline of snowkite that kind of depower would be a HUGE asset. Now we have the Peak and this kite has the potential to push my game up a notch or two. If there were a higher AR version it would be a relatively easy ticket to the 80mph+ range.

Really, the Peak or the Access, you can't go wrong with either as they are both great kites in their own right. But be wary of opinions based on very limited flight time on a given kite.



ssayre - 29-10-2014 at 06:28 AM

Yeah, I was kidding, I know race kites aren't known for their gust munching ability. For my similar gusty conditions, I don't plan on using my fb foils for traction any longer (unless I have a very clean wind day). A good pilot can make any kite work, but the other good offerings of depower and ns2 make it so much easier for the casual user IMO.

Robinsonpr, I would listen to Feyd if I were you. Also, pretty much everyone else that has tried them have echoed his findings.

soliver - 29-10-2014 at 06:32 AM

This is a phenomenal thread Feyd,... If I could afford one, I'd be all over a 9m... I am loving my 12.5m M5 right now though.

robinsonpr - 29-10-2014 at 07:14 AM

Feyd, Ssayre, and everyone else for that matter, thank you all for you excellent and valued feedback.

I'm happy to say my mind made is made up now and am going to order the Peak 6m, it looks to fit the bill for me perfectly, and has the added bonus of small size and weight so I can easily take it on vacation, weekends away etc.

Regarding the colour of it, I'm a man that's quite comfortable with pink but I'm glad they ran out of cloth and have changed the colour of it to neon orange now :cool:

Now just need to figure out how to sneak it into the house past the wife!!!

Thanks again guys, fantastic forum and community you have going here!

Feyd - 29-10-2014 at 10:00 AM

There are a lot of kite forums out there but I have to say PKF is really the best in regards to the people who use it. The knowledge base is huge as is the respect base which seems to be lacking in some other forums.

Glad you made a decision robinsonpr, you won't be disappointed.

Just out of curiosity, the Peak you're getting, it's pink?


robinsonpr - 29-10-2014 at 10:06 AM

I JUST this second placed the order! Hovered with my finger on the "pay now" button for about 5 minutes, then just closed my eyes and pressed it.

I think (hope) I'm getting orange!!

Feyd - 29-10-2014 at 10:17 AM

It should be orange. Pink ran out in the first couple weeks of the kite's intro to market. Personally I like the pink, looks stunner in the sky. But Orange is awesome too.

Congrats and let us know how it goes!

robinsonpr - 29-10-2014 at 10:18 AM

Will do, I might even attempt a review :)

ssayre - 29-10-2014 at 12:45 PM

Congrats robinsonpr! Now, if only I can gather up the money to get one. :)

Kober - 29-10-2014 at 06:10 PM

Just met guy who got 9m from you when kiteboarding in local spot here in NJ ,,,, Got his contact info so I can try this Peak phenomenon when we get some snow on ground ...

Feyd - 29-10-2014 at 06:43 PM

Was it Eric?

I'd be psyched to hear your thoughts on it Konrad when you get the chance. :D

TEDWESLEY - 1-11-2014 at 10:35 AM

There are a couple of things that I've found that make this kite buggy friendly.
First, all of the reviews are accurate I can't add much to the well written reviews on this forum. It flies as stated.
No one has mentioned the short bar and easy reach to full depower. The short bar works very well in the buggy also the sheeting distance is
very comfortable while seated. The total depower that can be obtained allows you to pick your way through the pesky beach traffic of kids, dogs,
vacant minded beachgoers and even the occasional alligator. The light wind capabilities mean less worry about dropping the kite and lines on some
citizen in a crowded situation. I find that it turns as quickly as my 6.9m reactor in similar wind. Reverse launch is outstanding.
Peak 6m.

robinsonpr - 1-11-2014 at 10:46 AM

Got my 6m Peak yesterday, flew it today. Very very pleased. I'm gonna post a review from my beginners point of view. And a few pics 😊

mtuh - 17-11-2014 at 05:50 AM

Great information source this forum!

A question for Feyd:

In the beginning of your excellent Review you mentioned:
"That said we have come up with some simple mods that really broaden the wind range of both sizes but that's for another write up."

What were those mods that you came up with?

Regards,
Martin


Feyd - 17-11-2014 at 06:31 AM

Nothing major Martin.

We install a pigtail to the powered leader line first. The pigtail has 3 knots in it, approximately 1" apart. With this addition you can alter the depower/power range effect by the bar throw. We also slightly extended the length of our 4.5 lines to accommodate the pigtail addition and add a suicide figure 8 as a means of cleaning things up at the bar in regards to the 4.5 line slack in certain settings. Although a 1"-1.5 stainless ring will do the trick.

We have also taken to adding 5m extensions to the flying lines for lighter wind days or days where we are flying through channels and need the wing about tree line to get any wind. The Peak seems to be really sensitive to addition and subtraction of line length.

Essentially we've added some level of mechanical trim to the system while keeping within the intention of the original design of uber light weight and simplicity.

We've taken some shots of these additions and will be posting them on the Flysurfer Peak page of our website shortly.

mtuh - 17-11-2014 at 06:36 AM

Thanks!

I'll have a look at the website.

Martin

Feyd - 18-11-2014 at 03:10 PM

Bah! I've been slacking. Should have it on the site hopefully tomorrow. Been out flying with one of our kids programs which is always more fun than adding content to the site. :D

Tomorrow I'm in the office most of the day so I should be able to get it done. :P

mtuh - 20-11-2014 at 07:29 AM

What would you say is the low- and high end for the 6 and the 9 with your mod's?

I take it from what you said above that adding more than 5 m did not work well?

Martin

MeatÐriver - 20-11-2014 at 07:57 AM

Hey Chris, I notice a couple empty slots in that Peak page. Is that maybe a subtle hint? :D I know I have seen a few allusions of such. The quote "after the 1st" comes to mind.

Feyd - 21-11-2014 at 01:14 PM

Hey Meat, those are just place holders. We're considering expanding our Flysurfer offerings and will have them all on one page. There are rumors around the interwebs of additional sizes in the Peak line up but I cannot confirm or deny those rumors. We have not received any information in regards to pricing or availability on additional Peak sizes but if we do I will surely let folks know. ;)

mtuh, We haven't played much with extending the lines beyond 5m. I suspect there would be some additional benefit beyond what is achieved by simply adding the 5m but we frankly haven't found the need yet. :D But it's a good question. Of course with even more length you increase drag and steering lag but I would bet it would still be acceptable flight quality and even better ability to take more advantage of better wind up high if needed. Now I want to try it out and see. I was on ice yesterday for the first time this season and we have ice setting up nicely in a few areas that will give me room to run. I'll add more extensions and report back.

In regards to expansion of wind range. Low end is better at the expense of some depower but I feel these kites have enough depower that you can spare some on the lighter wind days if it means the difference between riding and not. I've never done a before and after comparison (Mod vs. Pre-Mod) but in side by side comparisons of two 6m Peaks the modded one flew circles around the un-modded. And that was with my extra 40+ lbs compared to the other pilot.

Another thing worth mentioning. The Peak responds to shortening lines as much as extending. So say for example you're out on your Peak and the wind increases drastically. If you double back the lines (something that is becoming harder to do on some kites with other safety systems or "Y" lines) you can reduce the power of the kite by about half.

Can be handy.




flyingcamel - 27-11-2014 at 09:31 PM

I finally had the opportunity to test my 9m peak on water in jersey for 20 min with safe conditions. it was at the end of my session when the wind started to die down and i was getting tired of doing figure 8's with my inflatable 13m. im 215 lbs dry, air temp was mid 40's, wind was 13kts gusting to 20 lulling to 10, and i was on a 165 cabrina stylus.

at 12 kts, it was a little tough to get up and cruising but on the 2nd power stroke i was off and moving and was amazed. it was easy to keep my line at the 12ish kt range and at 14 to 17kts it was easy to go up wind and didn't really have to work the kite at all. jumps were small and soft with very little hang time but i was also not going very fast. as far as the water relaunch, this is something i didn't test and hopefully never will because i shed enough tears over taking it out on sand and would like to keep salt water off it. i have seen 2 videos of it relaunching on water and from what i can tell from watching them and looking at the kite is you have to be quick if you crash it but if you get water into the leading edge its over and you'll have to restart on land unless the leading edge is pointed toward the sky. I would only use this in shallow water ( i was in 3 to 6 inches with the tide going out) or if your wearing good flotation and have boat support because if the wind dies on you or if it gets water in the LE then you'll have a sea anchor. and by wind dying i mean like no wind because this thing stays up in almost nothing.
i landed it behind my 13m which was still inflated since i was only out for 20 minutes and it went on the ground in its slinky like fashion and didn't move till i comfortably strolled up to it.

the time it took from me deciding to try the peak to being on the water with it was 6 minutes from being fully packed. cant wait to try it in the snow.

4w7s - 27-11-2014 at 11:10 PM

yeah, i tried the 9m Peak on water last summer and was not very comfortable with it. I have been flying LEI on water for 14 years and I rarely drop my kit but there is always that chance. I am sure it can be done though, but I just feel much safer with a water relaunchable kite. There is something different about the way the Peak feels on the water compared to an LEI. My 15m CORE xr2 is very fast so there is really no advantage to using the Peak anyway, other than the inflation part.

btw, I have a 6m Peak for sale if anyone is interested. In great condition, new last January, $650 complete. I will be ordering a new one as well as a new 4m and 9m.

UnknownAX - 28-11-2014 at 09:08 AM

The Peak2 has now been released before I've even gotten a chance to fly the first one, that's pretty unusual for Flysurfer. Then again, the Peak is a pretty unique kite and the first of it's kind so it of course still needs some refinement.

I hope they have made it flutter less as that seems to be a rather serious problem with the old Peak and some locals who fly the Peak are very concerned about the durability of it because of that. A single skin design simply doesn't maintain a clean airflow at the trailing edge as easily as a normal profile.

I really hope I get to try out the new Peak so I can see if it has caught up with the conventional kites in terms of general performance. It sure looks higher-performance compared to the old one. The 12m looks like a nice size and it's a real steal compared to most other kites!:(

Feyd - 28-11-2014 at 11:00 AM

Ax, don't worry. Be it the original or the PEAK 2 they are both great kites. In regards to flutter, that's the nature of the beast. I'm, told there's a substantial reduction in flutter on the Peak 2 as well as an increase in depower (I can't imagine) but as flutter is how it dumps power, I imagine it's kind of here to stay at some level. Like an SLE when depowered, they flutter like crazy. If the kite is being flown powered there is almost no flutter. Clean airflow is secondary IMO when I'm trying to dump power as fast as I can.

In regards to "catching up in terms of general performance" as far as a non-freestyle oriented kite goes IMO there is no catching up the PEAK was on par from the beginning. I would put the Peak head to head with anything out there. Even if used for freestyle once you get a feel for the difference the PEAK actually hucks well. 6m Kite loops like a dream. 9m, meh not so good but doable. ;)

Other changes like the new bar system with trim and stopper (gonna be sweet) and changes to AR will improver the overall versatility for sure. Having the 4m and 12m is a great move by Flysurfer and we're really excited about it.

As you point out the only unknown here is durability. We put a couple thousand miles on the Peaks last season and there were signs of wear in the hinge areas that allow the flutter during depower. You could see the fabric treatment breaking down. We simple reinforced those high wear areas with sail tape and they seemed to show no further signs of wear. Do we think these kites will stand the test of time like say an '05 Frenzy? Hard to say. Seems most kites used on snow tend to last a long, long time. But as we know, this is a brand new design. Only time will tell. One could argue that Flysurfer produces some really solid stuff with killer longevity. I wouldn't think the Peak is any different. Depends on what kind of abuse they were put through in the prototype stage I imagine. This said they did make some changes in the PK2 to offset some of the potential wear issues.

The 12m is going to be a light wind day saver. :D

Well done vid.
http://youtu.be/Cb3EWmZHO8o

robinsonpr - 28-11-2014 at 11:09 AM

Ouch, just bought the Peak and a 2 is out!? Would have hung on if I'd known!

Feyd - 28-11-2014 at 11:14 AM

Seriously Robin don't sweat it. The PEAK 1 is a killer kite and the 2 won't be available for a couple weeks yet. The Peak one, for what you were looking for, is a perfect fit. :D

robinsonpr - 28-11-2014 at 11:37 AM

Thanks Feyd 😊

Feyd - 28-11-2014 at 11:48 AM

It will be interesting to see how the given sizes compare to the original. The projected areas are lower in the 6 and 9m PK2. We'll have to do a side by side and find out.

robinsonpr - 28-11-2014 at 01:38 PM

So they are doing a 4, 6, 9 and 12m in the 2?

Do you know what's different with the bar setup?

robinsonpr - 28-11-2014 at 01:41 PM

Don't answer that, they've updated the flysurfer website :)

robinsonpr - 28-11-2014 at 01:48 PM

Ah man, how gutted am I....

http://www.boardway.org/news/flysurfer-peak2

The bar looks mint. Clamcleat adjuster, adjustable stopper ball thing like the Peter Lynn Navigator.

:barf:

Feyd - 28-11-2014 at 03:57 PM

I'm sure there will be some flavor of aftermarket trim system available for PEAK 1's. If not it would be easy enough to fabricate. The bar is nice but I can't help but feel it deviates from the uber light, bare bones simplicity that I personally find very attractive. But I suppose if you want to make it more familiar to the general public the new bar makes sense. In addition to the ability to really fine tune the performance on the fly.

Stopper balls are great. That will be really nice with the Peak. But again, you can get those after market for any kite out there.
:D

kiteballoon - 28-11-2014 at 08:04 PM

Feyd, can you describe the new safety system? It's a front line release I can see, but I'm curious how it works. Always curious to see new bar mods.

flyingcamel - 28-11-2014 at 09:27 PM

finally got to try the peak 9m"1" in snow. 215 lbs 8-10in powder on a snowboard and a decent hill with wind 8-18kts luls to 3 gusts to 25. was my first time snowkiting and i was scouting a new location to do it at since ive only heard of one by me and all i can say is that it was some of the most fun ive had in my life. when the wind blew hard i was flying up and down hill. the only thing i can really add here is the boosting. most of them were pretty weak mostly because i was getting used to the differences of sending this kite and my LEI, but i had this one boost today that really surprised me and was at least 10-15ft. no real hangtime, just a soft float back down.(didnt buy the kite for boosting) the kite in the big gusts would depower almost fully on command. its appearance when depowered in that wind is not pretty but your still in control. just overall really impressed with the wind range of this kite. cant wait to explore new spots with this kite. hard to find in north jersey and southern ny

Feyd - 30-11-2014 at 06:56 AM

HA! So glad you were able to finally get out on the snow with it! Good observation on the jumping ability of the Peak. We've found it is a really nice jumper but with a bit different timing than kites designed for hucking.

Psyched your happy with it. :D If you get the urge to come on up and visit us here in New Hampshire this winter we'd love to see ya. We've got a bit more riding here than your location it sounds like.


ssayre - 30-11-2014 at 07:08 AM

They sound great for snowkite. I'm looking forward to trying the 6m on the buggy. Although, it's going to take a lot to impress me as much as I like my current single skin kites.

Feyd - 1-12-2014 at 09:19 AM

I'd be curious to hear the differences between the NS2's and The Peak. I've never flown a NS2 or any NASA wings.

ssayre - 1-12-2014 at 10:11 AM


Quote:

I'd be curious to hear the differences between the NS2's and The Peak. I've never flown a NS2 or any NASA wings.


I can't wait to compare the 2 firsthand. To my knowledge, I haven't heard anyone that has both.

I'm guessing the upwind ability will be better on the peak, but upwind isn't really an issue for me riding in fields. All I need is a little bit of power to make it back to my starting point with the nasa's. My high drag conditions is where my ns2's really shine. They are the only kites that I have been able to start creating apparent wind and park and ride in my field conditions. I expect the ability to fly in very little wind will be similar in both kites and is the main reason I'm completely obsessed with single skin. I'm hoping for a large wind range and good depower ability with the Peak. There are times when my wind is spread out over a couple of sizes of NS2's which makes rigging the right kite a challenge at times. I'm pretty sure I'm going to like having both. Looking very forward to comparing them.

3shot - 1-12-2014 at 06:51 PM

I live vicariously through you Sean. Lol

ssayre - 7-12-2014 at 04:26 PM

I got to try out the peak 6m this weekend, static only. As I expected and was hoping, it's very stable and flies very easily in light wind and/or lulls in the wind. Saturday, I flew very briefly due to the mud but I was able to launch it in 17-23 winds and it seemed very controllable. I did keep it to the edges of the window because it was the first flight and I didn't know what to expect, but that was enough to see how well the depower worked. Today, winds were 7-10 and it flew very nicely. It's probably the easiest to re-launch in light wind of any kite I've ever flown. Seriously impressed with relaunch. I need to get a run on the buggy with it to form more of an opinion, but I think it will work nicely and give me depower ability on the really wacky days.

I can't say if I like it as well as the ns2's until I have more time on it and use it in motion. My first thoughts are the ns2's turn much quicker and pack up much smaller. The Peak, I assume, will provide more upwind and depower capability. For simplicity and ease of use, I would give an edge to the ns2's, but for performance and depower ability, the peak might even the score.

I do have a couple questions for Peak users. I noticed as you loop, the center lines develop twists. The only way to get the twists out was to loop the kite. Am I missing something? Also, It landed very nicely by pulling the steering lines, but what do you do next when getting ready to pack up? Do you stake down the safety line? Do you walk one of the steering lines up to the kite?

peak pic.jpg - 22kB

4w7s - 8-12-2014 at 04:20 PM

Hey sayre, glad you like the Peak!

If you want it ti turn really fast - and without lots of power - just pull one of the steering lines and the kite will loop almost instantly. As you become more in tune with the kite you can turn the kite according to your power needs by adjusting your steering methods spontaneously.

Good observation/question about the lines twisting. It is preferable to minimize the line twists in order for the safety to work properly (if needed). A few twists are inevitable sometimes but I always try to have it completely twist free when possible. Basically there are 2 ways to do this.
1. loop the kite in the opposite direction an equal number of times. again you can do this as a powered up long loop (hands on bar) or a fast spinning loop (using one of the steering lines.
2. unhook and untwist with the centerline below the bar.

I use both methods depending on the situation.

As a side note: I fly CORE inflatables and the Core Sensor bar has a below bar swivel built into the QR/chicken loop assembly. I really like the way this works, but needless to say it adds weight, complexity, and cost. I am sure that the Peak would fly on a Core bar. But I think part of the (FLYSURFER) objective of the Peak is to keep it simple, light, and affordable. So for the moment they probably try to stick to their philosophy for this kite. The other Flysurfer bars have a below bar swivel as well. Maybe in the future they will have other order options on bars...you can order a different bar separately if you really want, but that's a bit expensive...and to be honest I am fine with the simple setup of the stock Peak bar and have worked out all of those little issues for myself reasonably. I have seen a wide assortment of "above bar" swivel, mouse ears, ets, and none of those was very reliable...and I hate clutter above the bar if it can be avoided.

If you have landed the kite and it's windy enough that the kite blows away, you can either stake the safety line down (sometimes I wrap a line around my ski binding) and and walk to the kite...or walk hand over hand up the safety line...

In either case use your best judgement in terms of safety....i.e you wouldnt want a ski flying thru the air at you if for some reason the kite launches itself.

The more you fly the kite, the more comfortable you will get with these methods. Practice everything in light wind so you know the drill. As you know more wind can add many challenges.




ssayre - 8-12-2014 at 04:44 PM

Thanks Roberto, that's pretty much the conclusion I came to on the center line twists and the landing methods, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking something. I like the simplicity of the bar as well and don't see a need for a swivel. The twists occur right above the depower line so it's easy to see which way to loop to untwist if necessary. My only other observation is the small hole for the depower line. If it was at least flared a bit, I think that would help on depower line wear. Again, nothing major, and overall I really like the simple design. Looking forward to some motion with it if it ever stops raining.

robinsonpr - 9-12-2014 at 08:38 AM

Regarding the hole in the bar...I noticed that when you've got the bar turned one way or the other it makes it grip onto the depower line making it hard to move the bar in or out. A bit of a pain if you want to change the power mid turn.

Regarding staking it down I stake the chicken loop, and then get the back lines and secure them in the clip at the chicken loop so the stopper balls are behind the clip. So the brakes are on. Hard to explain, but check out this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asHhuGMq3xw

At 3:02 there is a short clip of "Keeping the Peak quiet on the snow". He just clips the stopper balls into a Carabiner, great idea!

Feyd - 9-12-2014 at 09:26 AM

A suggestion. Grab the back line balls first to stall and secure the kite. Personally I wouldn't recommend staking out the chicken loop unless ghost landing as seen here at 2:40

http://youtu.be/ziI6hs1co48?list=UU8RK0aY462-E5dDCzEWfZNw


When we ghost land we're anchored into the ice via an ice screw.

In the event that the backlines somehow get unsecure the kite will be in a situation where it can become powered if secured to the chicken loop. If you aren't using a screw in type of anchor and you're on dirt there's a chance the kite will pull the anchor if hit by a rogue gust. ;)

robinsonpr - 9-12-2014 at 09:30 AM

Yeah I should add I've only staked the chicken loop in light winds!

@Feyd what would you recommend I do on dirt in high winds? I mean what do I secure in order to safely get from the bar to the kite? (without a heavy duty anchor, just a regular stake)

Feyd - 9-12-2014 at 01:49 PM

Pretty much as SSayre and 7w4s discussed above. Even in high winds you can tail stall and land the kite but for getting the kite secured so you can pack up, especially without a solid anchor, you can simply pull the flag out line in to flag out the kite. Some people will release their chicken loop to do this while others do it by pulling the line in manually.

As soon a the kite is flagged out you simply walk up the line and secure it when you get to it. Some people will physically walk on the line even though I don't recommend that. Going hand over hand IMO is the better option.

Some people will even wrap the flag out line first as in a self rescue. Most people do what works best for them but as long as the kite is tensioned only on one line it's flagged and easy to secure.
:D

robinsonpr - 9-12-2014 at 01:51 PM

Gotcha, that makes sense, thanks!!!

ssayre - 9-12-2014 at 02:12 PM

I had my 3rd static flight today in winds 12-16. It's just simply awesome the way it can completely depower. Now that I have set up and pack up down, it's the fastest to set up of anything I have now (mainly because I share a bar between the nasa's). You can land it by pulling the knobs on the steering lines and you can steer it backwards straight down the power zone. Once landed, I could let go of the bar completely, take 2 steps back, and it would launch itself right up the middle with very little to no power (this may vary in high wind, not sure yet). It feels like it will cover the range of a 4 and 5.5 meter fb foil and almost a 3 meter. I won't know for sure until moving. I can't imagine a better kite to learn depower on. To sum it up, so far, everything said about the Peak is true.

Thanks guys, for the video links.

3shot - 9-12-2014 at 02:19 PM

Sounds like your having some fun Sean.

ssayre - 9-12-2014 at 02:24 PM

Too much fun. I need to focus on work a little more or santa's going to skip my house.

Feyd - 9-12-2014 at 05:03 PM

So SSayre, I'm curious in regards to feel is it much different than your NPW's? I've never flown a NPW so I have no point of reference or comparison. :(

In answer to your question about just letting it relaunch in higher winds, it will hand you your backside in really high winds but it is surprisingly gentle in some pretty stout stuff. As long as that bar is out its really forgiving. In that link I posted when I hot launch it you can see in spite of how fast it jumps up it doesn't yank me violently. We don't have another kite in our inventory that I could hot launch in those winds like that.

They really are pretty dang amazing kites.

ssayre - 9-12-2014 at 06:16 PM

They both share that single skin feel where they just want to fly and stay flying. I can control the power of the peak by letting the bar out. I control the power of the ns2 by where I put it in the sky. They both feel very comfortable to be hooked to. That's a feeling I just couldn't get with my fb foils in challenging conditions. The peak is better for gusts with its effective depower. The ns2's literally turn on a dime where the peak seams much slower to turn in the same conditions. The peak has a larger window. I really like both of them for their unique qualities but I like them more for the qualities they share. I think the peak will be awesome for my gustier days and I think the ns2's will give me that extreme low end torque when my field conditions are less than ideal which is quite often. I'll be able to make a much better comparison when I get moving with the peak.
 Pages:  1