Jovver
Member
Posts: 431
Registered: 26-12-2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Member Is Offline
|
|
Ozone Comparison
So I'm still in search of a high wind kite in the 3m range, and from what I hear, a lot of you NABX'ers wold have liked a nice small kite out there.
I sympathize with you guys completely as a couple of weeks ago (same day as the buggy video I posted) my 5m Flow spanked me real hard and I didn't
have anything smaller to use with a buggy. I've had my eye on a 3m Flow (because of familiarity) or an Imp III Quattro and would like to know if
anyone has done a direct comparison of the two. Which would be a better high wind buggy kite?
|
|
Maven454
Posting Freak
Posts: 1838
Registered: 2-7-2009
Location: Northern Virginia (DC)
Member Is Offline
Mood: I has a grumpy.
|
|
While I love my Imp, the Flow is a bit more heavily constructed and better for purposes other than static flying. Additionally, the Flow will get
further out toward the edge of the window, giving you less side pull than the Imp.
"I gave up on wind speeds... its either crappy, gravy, epic, or stupid... in that order"
--Drewculous
Ozone: Imp III Quattro 1m and 1.5m, Flow 2m, 3m, 4m, and 5m.
NAPKA# US454
|
|
Jovver
Member
Posts: 431
Registered: 26-12-2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Member Is Offline
|
|
I knew I could count on you Maven, you seem to be biased towards the Ozone's just like I am. Have you ever tried a 3.5m Imp? Do they all sit farther
back in the window or is more of an issue with the smaller ones? From what I have read the flow is designed as the step between the Imp and the
Access series. I kinda wanted to try a new series just to spice it up, but if it's a waste than maybe I'll just stick with the Flow... Although I am
still on the hunt for the elusive pink and blue Cult. :D
|
|
Maven454
Posting Freak
Posts: 1838
Registered: 2-7-2009
Location: Northern Virginia (DC)
Member Is Offline
Mood: I has a grumpy.
|
|
I haven't flown the latest (Imp III) in 3.5, though I did fly the Imp II in 3.5. That definitely sat further back in the window. The Imp is really
intended as a learning tool. It's a good kite, but the Flow is better and intended for more serious flying. I'd label the Flow as a step between the
Imp and the Yakuza, not the Access.
"I gave up on wind speeds... its either crappy, gravy, epic, or stupid... in that order"
--Drewculous
Ozone: Imp III Quattro 1m and 1.5m, Flow 2m, 3m, 4m, and 5m.
NAPKA# US454
|
|
BigMikesKites
Senior Member
Posts: 960
Registered: 24-12-2008
Location: Dallas (Area), TX
Member Is Offline
Mood: Go away RAIN
|
|
Definitely the flow. The Yakuza would be better on the buggy but it is a completely different animal.
Mike
Owner Big Mike's Kites
http://www.BigMikesKites.com
Kites: Most of them
Buggy: VTT BLACK WIDOW...The best
Peter Lynn XR+ w VTT Rail Kit
Landboard: Not a chance
Water: still trying
|
|
awindofchange
Posting Freak
Posts: 1945
Registered: 14-3-2006
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Awesome - totally awesome
|
|
I fully agree with Mavern on this one. The Flow is a little higher aspect ratio kite than the IMP - giving it more performance and the construction
is much better overall.
|
|
Jovver
Member
Posts: 431
Registered: 26-12-2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Member Is Offline
|
|
Perfect. Thanks guys for all the great info!
|
|
powerkiter82
Junior Member
Posts: 90
Registered: 1-1-2010
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Member Is Offline
|
|
I agree with everyone else. As the old saying goes, just go with the FLOW. I have had my 5m Flow for a while now and have a 2m on the way for higher
wind days. I think you will be happier in the long run with the Flow over the Imp.
|
|