rtz
Posting Freak
Posts: 1107
Registered: 12-10-2010
Location: Edmond, OK
Member Is Offline
|
|
Pic of the difference between old/new PL Folding axle width
The older buggy is a lot lighter and smaller.
IMG_0422
IMG_0423
Sting 1.7, 2.4 - Flow 2, 3, 4, 5 - Reactor 2.2, 2.8, 3.5, 4.4, 5.5 - Yakuza 2.2, 2.7 - JOJO 9
|
|
cheezycheese
Posting Freak
Posts: 3760
Registered: 18-8-2009
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: Ready for action !!!
|
|
Boy if I had the newer model I might have kept my folder...
US888
PL- Aero v1 11m / Phantom 6/9/12/15/18
Ozone Chrono v2 9m
Liquid Force Elite 6.5m
Flysurfer - Peak 3 4m
PKD - Century 2.5m, Soulfly 3.5m
Ted's Profoil-1m/3.5m
Custom NABX Rev
GT Rapide V/VTT-XR+ Special
|
|
awindofchange
Posting Freak
Posts: 1945
Registered: 14-3-2006
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Awesome - totally awesome
|
|
Its not just the width of the rear axle, the tubing throughout the buggy is much thicker - which is where the weight comes in. Thicker and stronger
all the way around. The Folding XR+ is much improved over the original.
|
|
Maven454
Posting Freak
Posts: 1838
Registered: 2-7-2009
Location: Northern Virginia (DC)
Member Is Offline
Mood: I has a grumpy.
|
|
Personally, I'd just like the slightly higher side rails.
"I gave up on wind speeds... its either crappy, gravy, epic, or stupid... in that order"
--Drewculous
Ozone: Imp III Quattro 1m and 1.5m, Flow 2m, 3m, 4m, and 5m.
NAPKA# US454
|
|