Good kite to prep for kite surfing and get a workout.
I am thinking about trying some kite surfing next spring/summer (taking a lesson and try it out) and currently I have a snapshot 1.9 and a Quantum
stunt kite.
Now I am looking for a step up both to get more of a workout but also to really learn how to handle a 4 line kite as a training for potential kite
surfing.
The kites I have looked at primarily are:
Ozone Octane (3 or 4m)
Prism Tensor (3 or 4m)
Also looked at a HQ Hydra 3.5 and Peter Lynn Hornet but somehow the two above just looks better to me.
Another one I just saw recently was HQ Scout II but that one is completely unknown to me.
I want to have them with a bar since that is what I would use if I started kite surfing.
Not interested in bugging and since I live in Texas snow is also out of the question. Winds here are usually 6-15mph.
Any advice on my two top choices above or would you recommend something else?
I looked at the Flexifoil 3.5 as well but with a bar it would get quite expensive and I got advice that it was not the best for training.
I am looking for a good quality kite that I can have for a while and travel with, including taking to the beach the few times I go there.
Appreciate your advice, in particular if I should go for a 3 or 4M but of course also on what kite!
I own the hydra and like it well enough. It will do a little better in gusty winds because it will hold it's shape better. Ozone and peterlynn
quality is great but I have no experience with the octane or hornet. I don't know anything bad about the prism. Overall I would say they are all
pretty equal kites except the hydra. It might be enough to body drag a little in high winds but you won't of course kiteboard. All of the kites will
spank you hard in too much wind but 6-15 should be perfect.
About 3 vs 4, how much do you weigh? I would lean towards 4m if you are heavier than 180 especially since you have a 1.9m
If you ever dunk your kite the only one that will be able to fly right away will be the hydra. All others will have to dry out. I don't know if that
is enough to warrant the hydra either.
US40
HQ 1.4m which my 8 and 10 year old fly
Pansh Flux 2m, Legend 3m,
HQ Hydra 300 PZ depower, Neo 8m, 11m
Flysurfer S3 Deluxe 19m, S2 15m
Flexboardz Haize
Radbuggy
SIMS snowboard
Crazy Fly 145
Ok, I have decided on the Tensor, now the only question is 3 or 4 m version.
Really like the combination of bar and handles.
Any advice on the 3 vs 4m? My winds are usually 5-15 with most days being 7-10mp, at times going up to 12.
Honestly, as a medium sized guy and you already have a 1.9 I would probably go with 4m for your winds. If you were maybe 150lbs or less I would say
the 3m.
US40
HQ 1.4m which my 8 and 10 year old fly
Pansh Flux 2m, Legend 3m,
HQ Hydra 300 PZ depower, Neo 8m, 11m
Flysurfer S3 Deluxe 19m, S2 15m
Flexboardz Haize
Radbuggy
SIMS snowboard
Crazy Fly 145
Hi, i'd like to tag team onto the thread if I might as it asks exactly the questions I'm asking myself. I'm 60, newly retired and looking for a new
sport that is both technically interesting and physical. A former ball player I weigh about 350lbs 6'5" and live in Sonoma Co, Ca.. I'll be usig this
at the ebach mostly but do have some big ope areas locally.
Dakitez has a few Prism 5m's available at a very decent price that I'm contemplating as an entry level kite but there is also a great deal or two to
be had on entry level depowers. At this point I'm simply looking for a kite with good flight characteristics and some pull. Given my size I obviously
I don't expect a 5m to boost me (and not particularly interested at being boosted/launched at this time as this is all new to me). Open to suggestions
for consideration.
I would still start with a 4m fixed bridle kite. You could start with 5m with your weight but you will be limited to lighter winds. More than I
could, but possibly not as much as you think. What are your average winds?
If you are sure you want a depower kite then it can be done. I think you might have a little frustration with the complexity of it. One simple bit
of advice might help. Start in light winds and fly with the bar pushed out. Pulling in the bar will slow and kill the kite in light winds but light
winds will help keep you from getting hurt. I understand that you weigh more than me. I really don't think that matters. either the fixed bridle
kite will generated enough energy to be pulled out of your hands or pull you over. When I have wakeboarded I have never been yanked from neck deep to
10 feet in the air by a boat. That has happened several times to me with a kite. If you are going to go depower first I would have to know your wind
ranges before recommending a kite.
US40
HQ 1.4m which my 8 and 10 year old fly
Pansh Flux 2m, Legend 3m,
HQ Hydra 300 PZ depower, Neo 8m, 11m
Flysurfer S3 Deluxe 19m, S2 15m
Flexboardz Haize
Radbuggy
SIMS snowboard
Crazy Fly 145
A fair enough request...I'll check some historic weather data and with some some shops in Marin County. Probably give DaKitez a call as well...no one
up here to ask questions of.
If you're going to static fly it, I would stay clear of the depowers - they're just a little slow and uninteresting to fly compared to fixed bridles.
The bigger the kite, the slower it is too - I would rather fly a zippy 3m in 15mph than a 5m in 10mph. And don't think a 3m won't give you a workout!
For something that's a hoot to fly static, I'd look at an intermediate 3 - 4m kite. Blurr, Method, Viper, Core, Buster, Toxic. Any of which will
give you a hell of a good workout and are all quality kites.
If not, well I have to say is thats the kind of static flying I would truly love to do. If it was yours, well thank you! I will keep your advice well
in mind as I continue to evaluate all aspects of my first kite.
EDIT: Lol,Now I'm sure it was yours, your comments on the YT video refelct yours here as well. Consistency is a good thing!
5m is a pretty large kite in FB ( tensor ) and small in Depower ( apex ).
If you are out for simple static flying fun then I suggest 3m FB on handles. The tensor is nice with the combo handle / bar package but you will end
up using it with handle set up. %m FB is actually pretty large and you will be overpowered in some pretty light winds. 3m allows you the largest wind
range static.
A depower costs more + you require a harness to fly it properly. A fun way to fly but depower really shines when you are in motion.
Indeed BR, I'm coming to that same conclusion...between checking posts here I have been devouring what info I can and checking out used and closeout
pricing. The Tensor 3.1 is really standing out at this point with still a slight inclination toward the Apex 5m...comment about uses and motion are
valuable...speaking of value one of the things that really stands out in the Tensor systems is the bar to handle conversion and the 3 line
configuration. John Holgate (still asleep in Australia at this time no doubt) made some recommendations but I'm also interested in seeking your
opinion as well; Do you have recommendations for other 3 to 4m kites with or without similar packages/configurations as the Tensor? Was the
marketting team at Tensor ahead of the competition with their kite package here?
ur gonna get a 5 at some point......get a 3 now u will not regret it.....3's are so much fun and will take your knowledge to where u need to be the
fastest (can fly more).....dont get hung up too much on what company....so far i've liked every foil i have owned..even the ones i haven't
particularly liked
Pretty much there...some kites are constructed of better materials (and cost more) some are constructed using lesser materials (still plenty adequate)
but are more complete as a package. At this point I'm looking at a 3.1m Tensor, I like the recommendations I've been seeing, the kite itself, and the
3 line configuration package they offer which allows for handles and an Oh @%#$^! line. Found a year end clearance price that is very sweet and I
belive thats where its at for the moment...there is always a used kite sale and I'll keep my eye peeled for that first larger depower.
John Holgate (still asleep in Australia at this time no doubt)
Yawn....sounds about right!
The 5m Apex is probably the most stable kite I own. In gusty inland conditions, it is my goto kite. It's a piece of cake to fly one handed while
filming. It is an excellent, stable buggy engine. To fly static, it's a bit slow and well....er...boring.
In the buggy, I want something that I don't have to concentrate on and just about flies itself so that I can worry about other things...like relaxing
and taking in the scenery. But if I'm static flying, I want to have some fun with the kite - I don't want to be constantly fighting the kite which is
why I prefer static flying a smaller kite.
And four line handles all the way for static flying - they allow you to do anything you want with the kite, they're cheap, compact and standard and if
you want to take the load off your arms, then a a strop/pulley & harness is easily done.
I've never flown a Tensor, but they seem to be pretty well regarded and really, a kite from Prism, PL, Flexifoil, Ozone, PKD, HQ, Zebra are all good
quality and will be good buys.
A larger depower later down the track will be good if you're looking to try a little jumping - go 9 - 12m. And not the Apex for jumping - my 5m lets
me down with a pronounced thud! Even the 7.5m has very little float. Frenzy's are good for that as are some of the Arcs (which I've only flown
briefly).
So far, the kite I have enjoyed most for static flying is the 3m Method. It's smooth, fast and responsive and pretty much a joy to fly. Works nicely
with a turbo bar when buggying but there's no advantage in using a bar for static flying that I've found.
Well thanks to all, John, Abs, Bladerunner and Stetson. Every reply I received had a gem piece of info that went into the mix. I ended up splitting
the difference both from a size and configuration standpoint by purchasing a slightly larger FB kite...a Tensor 4.2. This choice was preceded by a few
phone calls to some manufacturers this morning and a lunch time call to a "local" dealer (across the Valley) here in California. Dino at DaKitez
spent the better part of an hour and a half on the phone asking questions and listening to what I knew and wanted to do based on where I intended to
fly and how I wanted to fly. A model year end price and a virtual handshake sealed the deal. I'd like to also thank Big Mike for his interest and
diligence exchanging emails with me over simialr topics. Both dealers are truly interested in seeing you make good choices.
I have to say that the Prism Marketting and Engineering folks are really in sync with what a brand new flyer is interested in. They understand that a
tyro owner may want a bar for a few hours of orientation flying only to see the bar jettisoned for the handles shortly thereafter. The r2f packaging
is great.
Other than perhaps slapping my old Vietnam era pot on my head, some gloves and an oxygen mask in the highly unlikely offchance I get boosted to
stratospheric heights, I'm good to go! Really looking forward to next weekend in SoCal at Torrance Beach. Hmmmm..I suppose I ought to check the parks
dept and see if they have any regs in place. I wouldn't want Johnny Roller to make an appearance and throw a 60 YO kid in the slammer for felony kite
flying or something. At least not in front of the grandkid...The winter mornings there (without a storm on the horizon) are tyically mild breezed with
wind picking up through the morning and peaking in the midafternoon. Got a small Dwyer wind speed indicator to calibrate myself and a note pad make a
few flight log entries... I'm simply jacked!
Tensor is the only kite I know of that has the bar / handle combo from the factory.
If you like the idea of 3 line and plan to move to water a Hydra is one to look at as well. You can take the Hydra out in the water and relaunch if
you crash. You can practice body dragging with it in stronger winds.
It is interesting seeing Prism pop up in these discussions. Has anyone with experience flying more advanced kites flown a Tensor? How do they
compare to other entry level foils?
Personally if anyone wishes to get into power kiting I would recommend getting a kite from a manufacturer who also makes the type of kites you
eventually wish to fly. That way you get a feel for the quality and characteristics of the kites that they make, and you then have some experience
with that manufacturers kites when you are deciding on your next purchase, for good or bad.
As for the handles and bar combined, I don't see the point. Sure it appeals to people who haven't flown before, but learning to fly on handles isn't
exactly much more difficult, if you ignore the brakes it is essentially the same. I would prefer some handles that are designed specifically as
handles.
Good point Dembones.
I think the bar handle combo is a bit gimicky. Where I think it is good is allowing a beginer stuck on wanting a bar to see how much better it flies
in handle mode.
Your point about starting with Prism meaning you need to move brands to move into true engines is valid.
Interesting DB and BR. As to the bar/handle combo being gimmicky I can see your perspectives. We seem to agree it's not entirely useless. Bones'
comments about providing better handles did give me pause. Were the Tenbsors missing some important feature? I went back to look at a variety of
handles and frankly I couldnt see a lot of differences between other trainer handles, the tensor's, and some more noteworthy brand kites. I think the
bar/handle combo is simply an elegant solution of providing a secure entry step to handles. I would also like to see an experienced flyers impression
of the Tensor line.
I'm intrigued by Bones' recommendation regarding 1st kite choice; or at least the choice of Tensor who has only a limited selection of power kites.
I'm not so certain it makes that much difference at an entry level as long as its sized appropriately, of decent construction, and flies well. Its my
first kite. I get what's being said but it just doesnt/didnt click for me. I mean as a first time buyer interested in getting into the sport and test
the waters why would I want to spend more money on a brand name for an entry level kite? Are they really indicative of another model in the mftr's
line? Does the recommendation bear more weight if one knows what they want to do down the road?
Left to my own devices I judged that Prism has a good reputation, informal comments indicate the Tensors fly well, are of good manufacture, and are
backed by a dealer network that is entusiastic about the product. I spent about a week reading, reviewing, emailing and calling various dealers and
manufacturers before I pulled the trigger. After all was said and done I decided that better known products were similar in function, but pricier. The
Tensors got me to the same place and were a better value.
I'd submit that price point is weighted far more heavily than manufacturer in most first time buyers. I dont mean to say buy the first cheap rag that
comes your way. That's not what I'm talking about. It's overall value. Given overall value I'm not sure I would buy a Pansh, Lynn or Ozone for my
first kite, even if I wanted one of their other larger kites down the road. I recently watched a side by side comparison of material and construction
quality between newer Pansh and HQ kites on YouTube. The Pansh proponent made a strong case. The Pansh was impressive.
Would I spend more on my first kite because I might consider one of their larger speciality kites in the future? As a first time buyer personally I
dont think so. However, I will definitely consider one if the hobby sets with me. They and others, are beautifully made and designed.
Just about everyone here has quite a mixed bag of kites from various manufacturers; few, if anyone here (sponsored flyers?) own one kite brand
exclusively for their various interests. Was your second kite of the same mftr? (Now theres and interesting question...) I'm just not sure that
purchasing ones first kite from a company with a larger catalog is necessarily an indication of things to come on several levels. Its like declaring
brand loyalty before you even know anything. I realize this was DemBones personal recommendation, I'm not dissing it, I respect it. I'm simply
expressing my own thoughts as a first time buyer who doesnt know where I'll be going with this. Someone who knows where they want to go with kiting
may have a diffrent perspective and that may be the basis for the difference of opinion here.
I think this has more to do with 'track record' than anything else. The Tensor is Prism's first ? commercial, serious 4 line power kite and as such,
the company doesn't really have a track record in this area. Which is not to say that there is anything wrong with it - I haven't heard anything bad
about it at all and I have a Snapshot which I really like.
Pansh have a dubious track record. (from reading lots of forum posts) In the past, their kites have been built to a price point and quality was well
below Ozone, HQ, PL, Flexifoil, PKD etc however it would seem Pansh are getting better by all reports and now seem to manufacture pretty good kites.
The other companies mentioned have been making power kites for a long time of excellent quality and are known and trusted. My first power kite was an
Ozone Imp Quattro 2.5m - it's been bashed by me while I was learning and several friends also over the last three years, subjected to getting wet,
flying it in 30 knots and dragging it through thistles and sheep poo. And it's still in pretty good shape and I'm happy to hand it to anyone wanting
to give it a go. THAT's why I would stick to a known brand with a proven track record. That and a good back-up network - ie: local dealers who can
make repairs or deal with warranty issues (never had one).
Is there a big difference between similar style kites in the other brands ?....I would say no. Some will fly a little faster than others, have a
slightly wider window, some will create a bit more power and some will be prone to the occasional luff - but I'm only talking 10-20% difference in low
aspect kites - at least those that I have flown.
Once you start comparing intermediate or race kites to low aspect kites then you will see huge differences. ie: The 2.8m Century II that I recently
sold had at least twice the power of my 3m Ozone Flow. It was a completely different beast to fly. And it outperforms my 4m Method in the bottom half
of the wind range.
But, I think you've done exactly the right things and by all accounts, the Tensor should be as good as the other brand's low aspect kites and while
they may not have a track record in four line power kites, they are still a long standing manufacturer of kites with a large dealer network. Damn
nice looking kite too!
Excellent analysis. Another aspect to take into account and one that I suspect is largely the basis for DemBones opening comment. Interesting comment
about Pansh's history John. Shows what I know lol! ...As new kid on the block I'll offer to wash the dishes.