Why don't you simply measure it ?. You'll get a more accurate figure than a nominal size indicates. It is particularly easy with Nasas because of
straight edges. BTW I measured my Nasa Stars some time ago. They all are considerably smaller than the nominal size.
Why don't you simply measure it ?. You'll get a more accurate figure than a nominal size indicates. It is particularly easy with Nasas because of
straight edges. BTW I measured my Nasa Stars some time ago. They all are considerably smaller than the nominal size.
I measured my 5.5 as well, and came up with something a little less than 5. There is some shrinkage when sewing but its only 1-2%.
I would measure it if I owned one. I want one but I want to know the sizes to get a idea about the pull they generate before I buy one. I love that
episode of Seinfeld LOL
I would measure it if I owned one. I want one but I want to know the sizes to get a idea about the pull they generate before I buy one. I love that
episode of Seinfeld LOL
Can't speak for the Uniq Play, but the Uniq Quad had comparatively larger pull in the meat of the wind window (directly downwind) than a FB PL Hornet
of comparable size. However, compared to the Hornet it did not have nearly as large of wind window nor was its build up of power as smooth. Sort of a
punch in the middle with a quick trail off. For single skin simple flying I prefer the NASA Stars.
![[*]](images/perspective/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
