There was finally a good steady wind out here today, so I was flying and tuning my (homemade) 1m NPW9b. Now there are tons of knots and loops all over
the lines by the handles... but it flies pretty damn good. The brake line length is so critical, I went from spontaneous backward flight in gusts (too
much brake) to constant nose collapse (not enough brake) to the right setting just by adjusting the brake lines within about 1 inch.
Question is, I can't seem to park it at apex without some control input. If I park at apex and hold both handles in one hand, it will slide down and
crash on one side of the window within 20 seconds or so (usually the left side, i think that line may be a tiny bit shorter). Is this expected of NPW
kites, are they just not that stable? Is it the size (it's almost like a stunter, super fast and maneuverable) Or should I keep tuning the lines until
it will stay put?
I really do like the NPW behaviour in the prairie gusts, feels very powerful for its size but safe. If a really hard gust hits, it tends to
temporarily collapse into a flag rather than try to haul me off my feet. It's amazing how much "depower" an NPW has by hitting the brakes, too...
really easy to back it down and land by applying the brakes gently.
I fly the NPW's with PKD handles which have a clam cleat brake adjuster which makes all the knots go away.
If you use a long strop with big loops on each end you can use a larks head on each handle about an inch or so below the power lines to balance the
kite. you will have to slide the larks head up or down the handle to fine tune the kite but you will sooner or later get it so you can fly one handed.
have flown it that way in smooth winds and just let it park with no hands for a bit.
Appex buggy, Libre hardcore buggies.
Flexboardz. Blokarts.
PKD Century Soulflys. NPW's. Nasa Stars.
A few other less flown oddballs,
Line sets from 10" to 328" or 2m to 100m.
worlds only AQR that works.
North American distributor for PKD.
"Kite Bugging is not an addiction until you try to quit".
If one handed is important it would be much easier with the NPW on a bar . Tune it to fly on a bar and it should fly one handed on handles with a bit
of control .
Those handles/bar are pretty neat! My handles are made of 3/4" electrical PVC conduit prebent to 45 degrees They are flared to fit together, but
unfortunately, both power ends are flared as I never thought of putting the handles together into a bar. I think they may be a bit short for a bigger
kite but they work well on the 1m.
I also like the cleat for the brake lines, I know those cleats from sailing. Maybe I should get a pair of those for my 3m that I am building, my only
question is, do they slip when you pack up your kite such that you have to readjust them the next time you fly?
I don't really NEED to fly one handed (yet...) but was trying to take a photo of the kite with my other hand, and was curious whether it was my tuning
or if it is the nature of the NPW to be unstable.
Originally posted by rectifier
Question is, I can't seem to park it at apex without some control input. If I park at apex and hold both handles in one hand, it will slide down and
crash on one side of the window within 20 seconds or so (usually the left side, i think that line may be a tiny bit shorter). Is this expected of NPW
kites, are they just not that stable? Is it the size (it's almost like a stunter, super fast and maneuverable) Or should I keep tuning the lines until
it will stay put?
I think it is probably a little bit from pots A, B and C. First off my gut feel is that 20 seconds of stable parking at apex sounds pretty impressive
for a kite of this style.
Mine are very sensitive to differences in flyer to kite distances so there is a good chance that there is a slight difference in where you "final"
knot ended up on either side.
Being a single skin kite there is less structure to "hold" the wind than a foil or a framed kite so it needs steady line tension. I find mine to be
much happier when "sheeted into the wind" than when flagged out on the power leads.
At the small sizes it seems that all quad line kites tend to behave like a humming bird on espresso or that squirrel from Over the Hedge.
NASA wings -1 to 12m [mostly KM4]
Foils -2 -12m [mostly PL & Pansh]
VTT Stinger on Midi's
Another day in Paradise...
Anyone ever try the paraskiflex bar on a NPW? Like this one I tried with my Syn's. Could be an interesting option??
2016 CORE Section wave 6m and 9m
CORE Sensor2 controlbar
2016 5'2" North WHIP surfboard
Zeeko Spitfire XLW foil and 5'0 custom foilboard
Electric Outback MountainBoard
Any old $100 snowboard
Wow, I've never seen such a system (paraskiflex). I looked at their kites, and they are really quite similar to NPWs, even though people who paid
money for them claim they are not . All they really are is a simplified NPW with
a leading edge stiffener, in the videos they have a very similar leading edge "tucked nose" shape. In fact I don't see why a NPW wouldn't outperform
such a simple single skin foil... yet their foils are apparently extremely popular in Quebec, perhaps due to the easy control system?
I see no reason why a NPW won't fly on such a bar with short lines, it looks like a great setup for park riding. Just point the kite where you want it
to go, move your hand up and down the bar to adjust brake bias. I have done a similar thing with my handles held close together on short lines but
never thought of using one bar... I'm going to have to try that when I get my bigger NPW built.
Bob, nice NPW cruising, is that your 7M? Looks like yours is pretty stable. Who knows, mine might have just been knocked over by gusts, it was a
pretty gusty day here... here's 10s of video that I managed to shoot one time I had it up one handed.
difficult, alternating, changing low wind conditions. yet, it was possible to fly the nasastar using the paraskiflex style bar one handed. though i
really prefer to fly the nasastar in 4line mode on handles. gives me much more control.
That Paraskiflex rig looks a bit awkward to me. You can certainly run an NPW on a two line bar....which is what my Nasa Star 2's essentially are. Or
handles. There is a third 'depower'/'flag out' type line rigged in the center of the kite but you don't need to use it. I've tried the 2.5m in four
line mode with a Turbo Bar but it turned far too quickly. Might work better with power lines to the outside of the bar and brakes through the center
- haven't tried it yet but there's plenty of ways to skin a cat....
Some details of the two line bar (and using the third 'depower' line) here:
did you just go out and try it today Herc!? Not much wind but it looked pretty easy to fly.
Are the brake and power lines the same length or did you have to do some tuning? I noticed no nose collapse which is good for those conditions.
I agree handles will obviously give more control. The paraskiflex bar sort of turns your kite into a kitewing... takes some of the fun of flying away
for sure, but might be good for messing around in the park, on the road or in small boats etc... where you want to keep the kite close and under
strict control.
John: I tried flying NPW on 2 lines and personally thought it really handled like a dog compared to on 4. Slow turning and hard to keep edged into the
wind as you lose that brake bias control... also you can only hot launch which scares me as a rookie. It obviously works for you though
also you can only hot launch which scares me as a rookie.
I tend to do a 'cheat's' side launch...I'll walk around a bit to the side then as soon as I pick the kite up, I put the kite on it's side and quicken
my pace in the opposite direction. Certainly not a true side launch, but it helps.
@rectifier: no, the vid is a few days older. no tuning needed !
i found out later that you can avoid some tip - flutter if you also put all tip lines ( nasawing specific: all B-Lines) to the front lines. just the
last two inner A's as brake.
i also experimented with a depower setup for the nasastar:
this way you can quite nicely control the power in the nasawing and its also very helpful if you have phases of total light winds. with this setup i
could completely avoid that dreaded stalling and backwards flying behaviour of all nasawings that they show in gusty light winds.
disadvantage is that the nasawing starts to flutter if depowered. you can avoid that as said above by putting all outer tip lines to the front. than
they act sort of like the stabilo of opencell kites / paragliders and keep the sail tension to some degree.
anyway. if you dont care about flutter, i can only suggest such a simple depower mod, because you can instantaneously regulate / drop power in the
kite if a gust hits you.
That's neat, any video of it working? Does it still fly like a NPW or does it handle more like a depower now? I notice it is still on handles and not
a bar.
Does it really adjust the AoA of the entire parawing or does it just change the way the brakes are applied to dump air? You are saying you get better
performance in light wind (like a depower that has been... depowered) which implies the AoA is indeed changing. This would be great to keep it off the
ground during a lull when it comes gently drifting down, sail still full but not quite enough wind...
I would love to see specs as to how which bridles are attached where. Is a nasastar a NPW5 or NPW9? All the tinkering is really what is fun about NPW
kites
the mod really helps me to keep the nasawing in the air even if the wind drops almost kompletely. also, i can regulate power. because on inline
skates, you can get very fast even with a small gust (because you have almost no friction on a good asphalt road) because i am scared of too much
speed with inline skates (n helmet, no pads - my bad) i just release the handles. the nasawing then starts to flutter but looses most of its pull.
i fly on handles because i have more control. of course, you have a bit more pressure on the back lines but with this 4 sqm nasastar II , its ok. with
a bigger nasawing i can imagine using a bar will be better. as you can see in the video, i am grabbing the handles more ini the middle, such that
forces balance better.
yes, this mod really changes the AoA. of course, the nasawing has only a very small AoA range, where it will not flutter. but the AoA range with
flutter and less power is larger. i have little problems with nose collapse, but i think this might be because its a nasastar. maybe a npw5/9 will
have more nose collapse..
regarding the bridles: you usually have twelve rows of inner bridles. i take the first four to the frontlines, the next four to the pulley and the
last four to the brake. all outer bridles go to the front lines. if you have another set of inner bridles (like with the npw9) just distribute all
inner bridles in proportion to the depower pulley layout..
btw, you should use a little steel ring instead of the pulley. i noticed that with my rather heavy pulleys the bridle tends to entangle...
you could even use a two pulley / ring depower mod - then you can keep the profile smoother. but is it really worth the effort? its then harder to get
all lines to equal length if you have the depower bridle in neutral position.
how i made the depower bridle :
just took two approx 2 meter long kite lines (for each side). then put loops on each end. next, i put the pulley in the middle. then i arranged the
line to lay in zigzag and put at the lower zags (where front and brake lines will be attached) smaller loops that i could readjust by putting them on
using a prusik knot:
Neat. It does seem to have quite a narrow range in which it doesn't flutter, maybe it's not for me (yet). I spent ages just tuning all the flutter out
of my NPW! Though from the stalls at the end it looks like your video involved VERY light wind, so the performance may be better than it appears,
maybe the kite would have been stalling instead of fluttering if not modded?
I think I'll have to get a couple of stock NPW builds under my belt and understand the bridling a bit more before I start trying this kind of mod but
I do find it interesting. I like the ability to dump power rapidly and think that would be useful in many gusty situations. I hope you keep developing
this, it's a great direction for nasawings to go in. They are already a great inland kite and this kind of mod could make them even more versatile in
our gusty wind.
In response to your original question, add dual brake lines. Make a second set of brake lines for A11/A12 (and B/C depending how many bridle sets you
have) and run them to the QP gather. That way there is brake input even when you let the brake lines go loose, which prevents nose collapse. May need
a little tuning but once set-up it then doesn't need the level of brake / power balance.
When you add brake input for turns or back stalling you see the additional lines go slack as you now have control through the brake line as normal.
Blade V 4.9m & 8.5m VIP,Ozone Frenzy 11m, SS Flexifoil buggy, PL hybrid suspension buggy (PTW), MBS core 95.
homemade:
NPW 9b: 7m (Union Jack). NPW 9b HA 3m (Damien) and 10m (Jolly R). NPW21 3m, 5m (aka Zombie), 8m (Batman), 11.5m (NASA), NPW 21 HA 6.8m
The Hammers 5m, 7.2m & 12m
I do not see why you would want to fly any kite with one hand. I like to have as much control as possible when I fly so I use both hands. I have a
few handles that have cleats for adjusting the brake lines in flight and I find them useful.
Susan (npw goddess)
Quote:
Originally posted by rectifier
There was finally a good steady wind out here today, so I was flying and tuning my (homemade) 1m NPW9b. Now there are tons of knots and loops all over
the lines by the handles... but it flies pretty damn good. The brake line length is so critical, I went from spontaneous backward flight in gusts (too
much brake) to constant nose collapse (not enough brake) to the right setting just by adjusting the brake lines within about 1 inch.
Question is, I can't seem to park it at apex without some control input. If I park at apex and hold both handles in one hand, it will slide down and
crash on one side of the window within 20 seconds or so (usually the left side, i think that line may be a tiny bit shorter). Is this expected of NPW
kites, are they just not that stable? Is it the size (it's almost like a stunter, super fast and maneuverable) Or should I keep tuning the lines until
it will stay put?
I really do like the NPW behaviour in the prairie gusts, feels very powerful for its size but safe. If a really hard gust hits, it tends to
temporarily collapse into a flag rather than try to haul me off my feet. It's amazing how much "depower" an NPW has by hitting the brakes, too...
really easy to back it down and land by applying the brakes gently.
PKD Brooza\'s 2, 3, 4 and 5.5 meter
Libre Bora\'s 6 and 7 meter
Libre stainless full race with standard and big foot light wheels
Nasa wings: npw5 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.7, 2.4, 3.1, 3.9, 4.8, 5.8, 6.9 meters
npw9 3.4, 5.3, 6.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 15.0 meters
Quadrifoil xm for sale
I don't think it's to generally fly one-handed, it's just while it's sat at the zenith. Flying one handed whilst doing anything else... now there's a
recipe for disaster
But dual brakes on a NASA helps prevent nose collapse and is useful when using a strop line
Blade V 4.9m & 8.5m VIP,Ozone Frenzy 11m, SS Flexifoil buggy, PL hybrid suspension buggy (PTW), MBS core 95.
homemade:
NPW 9b: 7m (Union Jack). NPW 9b HA 3m (Damien) and 10m (Jolly R). NPW21 3m, 5m (aka Zombie), 8m (Batman), 11.5m (NASA), NPW 21 HA 6.8m
The Hammers 5m, 7.2m & 12m
I do not see why you would want to fly any kite with one hand.
For me, it's so I can film. It's mostly why I use a bar because I can fly that one handed more comfortably than handles. To a point - once the wind
picks up and the kites get smaller then there's no more one handed shenanigans!!