Proletariat
Senior Member
  
Posts: 896
Registered: 11-5-2012
Location: Colorado
Member Is Offline
|
|
Which Peak II: 9m or 12m (also, a comparison of the Peak I 9m and Peak II 12m)
Sooo... It's no secret that I've been switching to LEI's recently. That's mainly because I'm doing more water, but also because
they handle really weird / gusty winds quite well. However, the one thing that LEI's are absolutely guaranteed to be horrible at is low, variable,
turbulent winds. Enter the fantastic Peak series from Flysurfer.
So my new quiver plan is to have almost entirely LEI's except for one for super low wind that's turbulent and variable. I love my Peak 9m for such
winds, but I want MOAR, so I have been eyeballing the 12m Peak 2 -- I finally had a chance to fly them back to back while trying to landboard on a
tiny grassy field. The wind was about 3-6 mph, turbulent and variable. In other words, a good day for video games. Instead, I was able to do a
"Peak-off" thanks to the generosity of FrontRangeJeff.
I've been flying the Peak I 9m for almost a year now, and I love the kite. Like any kite, there are pros & cons:
Peak I Pros
- minimalist design
- flies in no wind at all
- predictable
- forgiving
- insane amounts of depower
- super light bar & overall package
- setup & relaunch are a snap
- stability
- good looking
- relatively inexpensive
Peak I Cons
- bar bight (still doesn't allow turning & depower very easily)
- no trim / swivel
- slow turning
- flapping (I sort of like it now, to be honest)
- not a ton of lift, even when powered
- lots and lots of bridle
- packing up is kind of annoying (but not that bad)
So I was pretty excited when the Peak 2 series came out because items A, B, C, (D?), E, and F were all to be improved upon. Awesome, Flysurfer! So
the last thing to do before buying one is to try it out! It turns out, the Peak 2 ain't all shamrocks and leprechauns (Yeah, happy St. Patty's Day).
Here are some of the differences I noticed -- again, remember this is in the absolute GARBAGE winds for which I am purchasing this kite.
Looks
Both kites color schema are great, but the profile of the kite in the air is significantly different. While watching Jeff fly the Peak II, I noticed
that is significantly more curvy than the Peak I. The Peak I still looks like a flying-slab-o-kite, while the Peak II looks like a proper foil (from
the side). From the flier's perspective, the Peak II just looks way higher AR than the Peak I, but still looks like a flying rectangle. In other
words, the Peak II looks cooler from the non-pilot perspective, and the Peak I looks ridiculous regardless of your perspective  .
Winner: Peak II
Turn Speed
The 12m Peak II turns as fast as the 9m Peak I. This is because of the higher AR and bigger tips. It also has more of a curve (and thus 'rudder')
than the Peak I.
Winner: Peak II
Stability / Reliability
In my garbage winds, both Jeff and I noticed a really disturbing trend for the Peak II to fold its tips towards the center at inopportune times. I
thought it was turbulence, but I think in light winds it just likes to fold up a bit. I've noticed the same when I'm underpowered on other flysurfers
(most notably the bigger Speeds). A lot of times, I was leaning back on the lines to keep them taut and it folded up anyway. I was able to get it
popped back out by tugging on the back lines, but it happened WAY more than I was expecting -- once it even surprised me so badly that I fell on my
butt off my landboard (which I haven't done in ages). The Peak I didn't have this problem at all. I assume it's a function of the wider, higher AR
kite along with less bridle and garbage winds. If you look at videos on youtube of the Peak2, you can see that just about everyone else has this
problem at some point in the video, also. It's worth noting, and it's really really annoying because when it folds those tips, it literally just
falls out of the sky. The Peak I is just more stable in low winds, which is where the Peak series is supposed to excel, so this tendency puts the
Peak I ahead.
Winner:Peak I (note: I thought this might be much less probable on the 9m, but I saw people with 6m Peak II's having the same
problem)
Power / Grunt
The Peak I has a decent amount of grunt, but it doesn't move very fast through the air due to flapping turbulence and low AR. The Peak II moves more
quickly through the air, but still has a decent amount of flapping (more than I anticipated, to be honest). When flying close to the ground in
garbage winds, the 12m was able to get me moving where the 9m was barely able to budge me at all -- even with looping. The Peak II is great at
generating power in garbage winds when low to the ground, but once I got about 30 degrees or so (bottom line), it basically just died. It also
doesn't keep its power through the loop as well as the 9m did, but that may be a size difference thing. Coming OUT of the loop, the Peak II really
pulled hard -- even in almost no wind, but during the turn, I might as well have been flying a 2 line delta.
Winner: I think Peak II, but hard to tell with the size difference.
Depower
Not that I was depowering much, but they appear to be similar. The depower on these things is amazing.
Winner: Tie
Lift
Even in the horrible winds, I was able to generate a little lift from the 12m. The 9m is hard to catch any air on anyway, but it was dismally
impossible this day. I was really surprised that the 12m could generate any lift at all, but it did. Also, I noticed that in the low winds, it
doesn't generate a ton of lift near the top of the window, where you'd normally be jumping with a foil or LEI. Instead it was more suited to pendulum
(static) jumps and other types of jumps where the kite remains pretty low in the window. Again, might not be an issue in real wind, but in real wind,
I'll probably be on an LEI anyway, so it's worth noting.
Winner: Peak II
Bar
They fixed some little annoyances from the Peak I bar, but they also made it a LOT heavier. It's metal, I think, and the original Peak bar was
Carbon. The radius on both bars is pretty skinny, but also fits nice in the hand. The main 3 upgrades are as follows:
- The power line hole that's now been milled out so you can turn & depower at the same time without rubbing on the power line as much.
- There's now a swivel so you can unspin the center lines by pulling down on the bar (this mechanism honestly doesn't last long with heavy riding,
but it's nice while it works)
- There's a cam cleat trim that will most likely (if I've learned anything from the Peak I days and 1 day on the Peak II) always remain fully
powered. I've spoken with Chris about adding leaders to the power lines and I am convinced that it's a good idea on either kite.
Anyway, both bars are awesome, but with those 3 upgrades, I gotta say I like the new bar better -- ask me again after hiking 3 miles at 11,000 ft and
I might have a different answer.
Winner: Peak II
Apparent Wind / Upwind
Not that I was moving much, but they both seem to be about the same for apparent wind capabilities due to the flappiness. If you want to generate
apparent winds like mad, go for the Speed series. The Peak is all about the grunt. Upwind performance was way better than I thought it would be on
the Peak II... there wasn't enough wind to stay upwind on either kite, but the 12m was a little better -- This is also obviously significantly a
function of size, so the jury is still out, but I'm guessing the higher AR will make the Peak II the winner.
Winner: Jury's still out
Soooo... The Peak I is going to new home and I'm definitely buying a Peak II, foldy wings and all, but I'm still torn about the size. The 12m has a
ton of grunt and turns about as fast the Peak I 9m, but I can't help but ask a bunch of questions -- so now I'm torn. Here are my questions:
- "Could I generate the same amount of power from a Peak II 9m that I can loop faster and therefore more often?"
- "Will I miss the lift capability of a 12m if I go with Peak II 9m?"
- "The low end on the 9m and 12m is probably almost exactly the same (for flight... maybe 1-2 mph difference for traction), am I losing out on
high end capability by choosing the 12m?"
- "For low / garbage wind, is one better off getting a Peak I 9m and putting a better bar on it?"
Yeah, so now I'm totally torn. I'm guessing that if I have a chance to fly either kite in solid 5-15 mph, I'll be happy either way, but that 9m vs.
12m question is burning a smoking hole in my noggin'. I can't sleep... I can't think about anything else until I get this question resolved. Please
pipe up with your opinion and we'll let statistics decide 
|
|
soliver
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 3913
Registered: 15-12-2011
Location: somewhere, far, far away
Member Is Offline
Mood: sleepy
|
|
Always so thorough Dave... REALLY great write up and a tough decision, I'm sure!
Here's just what I'm thinking about; you probably ought to ask you self 2 questions:
1. What are your wind conditions like MOST FREQUENTLY?... do you get skunked more form too low wind or too high wind? I would say if its more
typically LOW you would want to lean more toward the 12m if more typically High, I would say 9m. I know you said there's not a great difference in the
low end, but given the slight difference in what's needed to get you moving, do your more frequent conditions warrant a 12m over a 9m? I think you can
even add the lift quotient here as well; will you more frequent conditions allow you to get air with the 9m or the 12m?
2. Given your concern over missing out on the high end of the 9m if you choose the 12m; will that high end be met by any of the LEIs you are planning
on picking up?
not having experience with your disciplines or with the Peak, those are just my initial thoughts, I can't really speak to the other questions... just
adding my 2 cents (though it's likely worth much less).
Gonna miss you at JIBE
I'm going to take a nap now
|
|
Feyd
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline
|
|
Very good write up!
It's a tough call with these kites deciding on a size when taking into account the level of overlap between each size.
In regards to a choice between the 9m and the 12m the big factors are (IMO) obviously your weight and most common wind conditions but also the surface
conditions and the type of ski (or board) you have on your feet. For me this season, with all the freakin snow we've gotten, I almost flew the 6m and
12m exclusively. The 6m for me @ 220lbs in in 1.5-3' of snow on a ski with 127mm under foot made for a great moderate to high wind kite. The 12m
made for a great moderate to low wind kite and was a session saver on light wind days for teaching. We can put a student on a 12m Peak2 in light
winds and get them up and riding. Whereas this was not an option just a few years ago.
The 12m is a beast with a 5m line extension if you want to get a bit more low end or if you have deeper conditions. As with all peaks you can get
considerable additional range, top and bottom, with variable line length.
In regards to the tendency for wingtip collapse on the Peak 2. Although accentuated by the higher AR, this is a tuning issue. The Peak 2's seem to
have a bit of a "bed in" period and may require some tuning on the "B" mixer to offset the changes in the kite's performance. Shortening the "B"
mixer about 2-4cm (depending on amount of instability) should do a good job of reducing that tip curl. You can also shorten one the bridle line that
spans the width of the wing and anchors at the pink pigtail connection near the wingtip logos. Loosen it, loop it once on each side and then tighten
it again. this will shorten that line buy about 10mm -/+ total and help to reduce some of the excess flutter and curl.
It's a tough comparison between the PK1 and 2. They really changed the Peak 2 so much compared to the Peak 1 we hardly even consider it the same
kite. The PK1 was a dyed in the wool alpine tour wing where the PK2 is geared to be more appealing to a broader user group with a higher AR, added
lift and new bar.
Personally, I would like to see both kite types in production. The PK1 is a bit more user friendly and IMO perfectly suited for what it was intended
for. The Peak 2 could be evolved further into the higher performance end of the pool and you would then have 2 single skin options depending on your
tastes.
Either way both are great kites.:D
Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
|
|
ssayre
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 3588
Registered: 15-8-2013
Location: Indiana
Member Is Offline
|
|
I voted 12 meter. However, I only skimmed the posts. Short attention span 
|
|
kiteballoon
Member
 
Posts: 233
Registered: 28-8-2012
Location: North Florida
Member Is Offline
Mood: The desert calls to me. NABX <3
|
|
Since I don't care about lift (and presumably in low wind, you don't either), I would probably go with keeping the Peak 1 9m and doing the bar mods to
make it a bit nicer, and potentially adding longer lines to push the envelope on windrange. While you ended up wanting the Peak II, your review would
have me happier buying the Peak 1
Plus, a kite in hand . . .
Currently enjoying a Charger 2 quiver
6.5, 8M, 10M, 12M <3
PL XR+ Buggy
|
|
Proletariat
Senior Member
  
Posts: 896
Registered: 11-5-2012
Location: Colorado
Member Is Offline
|
|
Good point.
1. Definitely skunked by low winds probably over 50% of the time, honestly.
2. Most definitely already covered by a 12m Cronix (flies in about 10 mph min) and an 8m RPM (Flies up to about 40mph)
Thanks!
Quote: Originally posted by soliver  | Always so thorough Dave... REALLY great write up and a tough decision, I'm sure!
Here's just what I'm thinking about; you probably ought to ask you self 2 questions:
1. What are your wind conditions like MOST FREQUENTLY?... do you get skunked more form too low wind or too high wind? I would say if its more
typically LOW you would want to lean more toward the 12m if more typically High, I would say 9m. I know you said there's not a great difference in the
low end, but given the slight difference in what's needed to get you moving, do your more frequent conditions warrant a 12m over a 9m? I think you can
even add the lift quotient here as well; will you more frequent conditions allow you to get air with the 9m or the 12m?
2. Given your concern over missing out on the high end of the 9m if you choose the 12m; will that high end be met by any of the LEIs you are planning
on picking up?
not having experience with your disciplines or with the Peak, those are just my initial thoughts, I can't really speak to the other questions... just
adding my 2 cents (though it's likely worth much less).
Gonna miss you at JIBE |
|
|
FrontRangeJeff
Member
 
Posts: 153
Registered: 2-5-2013
Location: Colorado - Westminster
Member Is Offline
Mood: No wind=ride bike...else kite!
|
|
Dave - I had a good day with the 12 yesterday in Broomfield...the tucking was MUCH less - but still occurred. I trace it to light winds while flying
at the edge of the window....basically keeping the kite loaded (with perfect bar pressure) minimizes it. The kite still was generating enough to board
in 5ish mph...even with the annoying tucking. pretty sure a 9 won't move.
Basically I'm still of the opinion that under 7 mph I'll stay home though. The 12 adds a few mph on the low end
For me the improvements to the bar (no more bite/quality and size) are paramount.
Kites: 4.5 SS RPM, 6 FS Unity, 7 OR Razor, 9 Nitro, 12 SS Rally, 14 Switch Nitro 4, 15.5 Helium 2
Boards: Trampa HolyPro 35 W Vertigo, Nobile NHP Split 134, Cab 136 XCaliber TT, Airush Sector 54 Directional, Skis, Snowboard
|
|
FrontRangeJeff
Member
 
Posts: 153
Registered: 2-5-2013
Location: Colorado - Westminster
Member Is Offline
Mood: No wind=ride bike...else kite!
|
|
Feyd - Thanks for the tuning tips!!! I'll take a look at mine.
Dave - final thought - For me after one day of actually usable wind (and space - 'cause Dave - lets be honest - that postage stamp was barely big
enough to even loop aggressively....) I'm pretty happy with choosing the 12 peak 2. The incremental weight increase of the 12 over the 9 does mean it
doesn't fly as loaded in ultra light winds but looping the hell out of a 9 in ultra light winds (like 5) or having the 12 I think we really are
looking at static only...BUT there are a handful of mph of usable power on the low end with the 12 where I was boarding happy as a clam where I don't
think a nine would have me moving.
High end of the 9 over the 12....I think is a non issue because both of us I think are looking Peak for ultra low wind option....good wind we're LEI
are we not?:D
Kites: 4.5 SS RPM, 6 FS Unity, 7 OR Razor, 9 Nitro, 12 SS Rally, 14 Switch Nitro 4, 15.5 Helium 2
Boards: Trampa HolyPro 35 W Vertigo, Nobile NHP Split 134, Cab 136 XCaliber TT, Airush Sector 54 Directional, Skis, Snowboard
|
|
PHREERIDER
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 5781
Registered: 13-2-2008
Location: SC
Member Is Offline
Mood: chilled....but ready to SAIL!
|
|
9m ....all my FS bars are custom super slotted for zero bar impingement . it definitely makes it faster in light air for snappy loop pops and let
outs or turn and pop loops.
if its not custom then everyone has it. go custom
|
|
Feyd
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline
|
|
I forgot to mention. When tuning the Peak 2 in addition to shortening the "B" mixer, shorten the "C-11" bridle at the wingtip. Simply loop the
bridle around the "LCL" 2X and retighten.
Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
|
|
FrontRangeJeff
Member
 
Posts: 153
Registered: 2-5-2013
Location: Colorado - Westminster
Member Is Offline
Mood: No wind=ride bike...else kite!
|
|
Awesome, Thanks Feyd!!! I'll do some tweaking to optimize my new 12 - so far I'm pretty pleased with it...hard pressed to have a better option for all
things other then the liquid..
The kite has already settled down a ton in the wing tip tucking dept from use but I'm going to make some tweaks
Kites: 4.5 SS RPM, 6 FS Unity, 7 OR Razor, 9 Nitro, 12 SS Rally, 14 Switch Nitro 4, 15.5 Helium 2
Boards: Trampa HolyPro 35 W Vertigo, Nobile NHP Split 134, Cab 136 XCaliber TT, Airush Sector 54 Directional, Skis, Snowboard
|
|
B-Roc
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 3161
Registered: 9-3-2006
Location: Massachusetts
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by PHREERIDER  | 9m ....all my FS bars are custom super slotted for zero bar impingement . it definitely makes it faster in light air for snappy loop pops and let
outs or turn and pop loops.
if its not custom then everyone has it. go custom |
Who drills it out for you and how is it done?
Depower Quiver: 14m Gin Eskimo, 10m Gin Eskimo III, 6m Gin Yeti, 4.5m Gin Yeti (custom bridle and mixer)
Fixed Bridle Quiver: MAC Bego 400, JOJO ET Instinct 2.5 & 5.5, Lil Devil 1.5, Sting 1.2
Rides: Ground Industries
|
|
Windstruck
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Get in my buggy!
|
|
Dave - great write up! Answered all of the questions (and then some) that I posed to you today on U2U. With all of this effort and thinking, why the
sale of the 12? Just curious.
I'm with you (living is similar locales): I want a decent option for junky low wind days and also weigh in at about 2 bills. Thoughts? Not sure I'm
ready for LEIs at this point.
Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)
Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)
Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)
Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR
NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
|
|
|