Just watched the video. Nice job Mike. I was pleased to see that the Quad lines were not permanently attached to the bridles (as compared to tying
your own larks head knots).
I can't remember exactly where I read this, but I know I saw somewhere that the flying lines were permanently attached to the bridle lines in this
series. On the PL website they list "Pre-attached, colour coded, durable DyneemaŽ flying lines" in the bullet points for the Uniq Quad. I could see
from the end of your unpacking video that the flying lines were wound separately in the bag with the handles, best-in-industry kite killers, etc.
Phew!
I'm going to try it both on the handles and the PL crossover bar you sold me a while back. I'll put in a good word with the Rain Gods for ya! :evil:
Hey Big Mike - when you do finally get a chance to fly them, could you try flying them off the handles/short lines. NPW fans like me would certainly
be interested in what you could say about that.
The lines on the Play and TR come 'connected' is a better word than attached.
They are pre connected, but can be removed. The Quad is not connected, like every other fixed bridle Peter Lynn sells.
Thanks for the post Marijn! My Uniq Quad 4.5M is en route from Big Mike and should be in my hands Monday. Can't wait! I already own and really like
the single skin Peak2 12M. I only have two beefs with the Peak2; occasional wing tip folding (likely "user error" on my part but I've read that
others too have dealt with this) and that the bridles are really complicated and easier than I like to tangle even when I'm being super careful.
Regarding the bridles, I appreciate that the Uniq is FB and the Peak2 is DP. What I'm really liking about the Uniq from the video (at about 1:20) is
the simplicity of the Uniq's bridle system. Sweet!
Any serious consideration or beta testing going on at PL along the lines of a Single Skin DP based off of the Uniq (or similar) platform? The shape
of the Uniq wing and the Peak2 wings are quite similar as you are doubtless aware. My vote would be that a series of single-skin DPs would be a
superb addition to an already great PL line of traction kites (with simple bridles please!). Make mom proud!
I just got the 1.5m quad for static flying. I don't think I have ever flown a kite with such a narrow wind window. Glad I wasn't planning on buggying
with one.
We've had dry weather for the past few days. Enough to dry out enough to get out there and try it. I've gathered a group together to assist with
flying. I hope to have videos put together by this evening or tomorrow morning at the latest.
BigMike has videos up of all 3 types of the Uniq on youtbe. No mention of bad behaviour. He tests the 1.5 play and 3.5 quad. Now I am just waiting for
mine to arrive.
Kites: HQ Symphony Beach III 1.3, HQ Symphony Pro 2.2, 200x70cm no-name, Peter Lynn Hornet III 3.0m2, Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 1.5m2, PL Uniq Play 1.0.
Non-power: Std + Full vented Freilein Windrider X (Rev style quads), Freilen Transeye. ITW Triton, some chinese SLK
I just got the 1.5m quad for static flying. I don't think I have ever flown a kite with such a narrow wind window. Glad I wasn't planning on buggying
with one.
Yeah the wind window is smaller on these kites compared to 'normal' fixed bridle kites, no-one ever said they would outperform existing powerkites on
every level right from the introduction of the first generation.
The other thing, yes the window gets narrower even more when the kite doesn't really gets enough wind, for it to be really effective in the light
stuff try putting on lighter flying lines.
You can imagine the weight of the (strong included) lines having quite an impact on a 1.5m single skin which weighs next to nothing.
Have fun with further testing!
And I saw a post on a a 'pass the 4.5'? Mike, get on the phone with VO, I'm sure something can be done
Here some raw video from my first flight with the Uniq Quad 1.5m2. http://youtu.be/7l4QWAB0ahQ
Gusty wind, 2-10 m/s, averaging 4-5 m/s. So good wind. But the kite really does not want to fly forward, even with lots of slack on the steering
lines. By mistake I had switched front/aft lines around at the kite end, so I flew with handles upside down, so the heavier lines behind could
influence it a bit. But, really a lazy kite that does not want to move much, difficult to turn, reacts very much to gusts. Not easy to turn, a little
too hard, and it collapses the side. Felt I had to fly it 2-line style while adding brake when pulling the side I want to steer to. Really
disappointed.
I feel my kite has wrong trim, since it really does not want to move forward. I can keep it hanging still in the air probably only 20 degrees off
ground, pointing up, full slack on brake lines. But it just hangs there. Anything else would move. At times I felt like it tried to simulate a SLK. I
have nothing of the forward movement I see elsewhere.
On the video there is a cheap 6m, $10 china SLK, which I use as wind indicator.
Kites: HQ Symphony Beach III 1.3, HQ Symphony Pro 2.2, 200x70cm no-name, Peter Lynn Hornet III 3.0m2, Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 1.5m2, PL Uniq Play 1.0.
Non-power: Std + Full vented Freilein Windrider X (Rev style quads), Freilen Transeye. ITW Triton, some chinese SLK
I think the first thing you have to do is set up your lines properly and redo the video. The fact that you set up your lines wrong and continued to
fly is a red flag to me:puzzled:. With that being said I think these single skin kites need a few more years of innovation to improve on present day
kites. they definitely have some issues and don't really improve on the kite technology we already have in my opinion.
@gemini, a blanket statement that single skin is not good yet is simply not true. You might not need the huge depower range that an inland flier such
as myself needs. Kites like the peak and nasa star allow me to have great sessions in crappy wind. On the performance side, Feyd has taken a peak to
67 mph and has said he can jump and kite loop with it. Also, the jibe guys said the peak was excellent at upwind. Also, guys have buggied across
mongolia with all single skin. I think they have proven themselves quite worthy to many many people. They're not for everyone, but they are great
kites just the same.
I don't know about the uniq but I will say that povlhp's flying style is the most unusual, unnatural, awkward that I have ever seen. Sorry no offense
but your previous rev flying might be causing problems??? I don't know.
Edit: povl, I was not trying to be insulting in any way. It's clear you know how to fly, but just looked like you were working harder than you had
to.
In my 10 years of flying many different types of kites all I can say is that the single skin does not bring much improvemt to the field. they only
thing I like Is tht they are a lighter kite to work with and may have a little bit more power for its size, but if u want me to go into the negatives
and I can make a list ex unstable in gusty winds, small windrange, flappy edges when not powered up , constant vibrating lines in the peak when
depowered, high bar pressure on the peak, looses power in turns and loops. I don't know about the uniq series as I have not flown one.
Fair enough I've flown an arc and several different types of fixed bridle
foils. I personally didn't care for them for my conditions. I haven't experienced the same issues that you have but I'm on a peak 1.
Gotta agree with ssayre on this one Gemini. I realize you have a broader experience in the single-skin waters than only the Uniq series, but it is
hardly a proper reflection of the current single-skin breed. The NS3s by Born-Kte are solid flyers in junky wind and uncanny flyers in clean on shore
ocean wind. The Peak-2s in turn suck up gusts with amazing depower capabilities. They have a learning curve but once you learn how they work they
really shine.
I owned (and promptly sold) a 4.5m PL Uniq Quad. I would agree with you that it is a kite not really ready for prime time, at least as a buggy engine.
I'd never cast a dark shadow over single skins based on the Uniq.
Here's the thing about single-skins that either is important to you or not. They pack up incredibly small! I have a series of different sized stuff
sacks in which I store my Born-Kite quiver. My smaller ones go into 2L sacks, and my 8.5m fits nicely in a 5L sack. I can get an entire quiver of 6
NS3s (including the 10.0 and 12.5m), 3 LongStars, and three bars into a single PL Lynx backpack. That's nine kites with three bars! Try that with
two-skinned kites of any variety.
The other thing super nice about single skinned kites is that they will launch in almost no wind. For static flying you can have fun flying sessions
in almost no wind.
"Looses power in the turns and loops"? Sorry but if you want to talk red flags, that's one right there. In the interest of trying to keep
mis-information about the Peak series of kites and the performance in general of single skin depowers I'm going to be blunt here. From what Gemini has
described it indicates that he is not flying the kite correctly. Sorry but IMO it's as simple as that.
People love to blame the gear. Much easier than looking at themselves. Watch the linked video of one of the first days out on the 6m PK2 last
season...
See at :37. Two loops used to build power in light winds. 2:00 illustrates it's upwind ability (which I think is quite good for this type of kite).
Now, this being said. The kite can be made to do loops and turns without power. @ 2:11, Down looping power stroke followed by a non powered stalling
loop then back to full power across the window. This gives the Peak a lot of options and allows one to put the Peak into some pretty damn precise
places that other kites can't manage nearly as easily or safely. Makes you feel like a damn ninja.
The Uniq IMO just muddies the waters. It's a fixed bridle and doesn't come close to what a Peak offers beyond being affordable, powerful for it's
size and compact. I would have liked to see PL come to market with a depower single skin. But for some reason they just can't give up on adding more
fixed bridles I guess. (What we need is a new Arc. One with no need to preinflate. CAN YOU IMAGINE?!!!)
Are single skins perfect? No. But they are a pretty substantial evolutionary step in kite development and for something so new they perform amazing.
Flysurfer wouldn't have bothered otherwise and I I don't think FLysurfer throws $$$ into R&D and then production if they don't see a future in it.
Sometimes manufacturers make mistakes, but I don't think the Peak is one of them.
They're great kites. If you take the time to learn how to get the most out of them.
Just like anything.
Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites. www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
For me it was difficult to get a flow, and fly 8-loops. My experience it mostly with Revolution style, and dual-line. Been out a few times with a PL
Hornet 3.0m2. I have fairly good control of these.
Regarding swapped lines, as long as I can fly it with ease with slack on the brake lines, and still pull them tight, it should not make much
difference, except a little with weight. Of course all the lines are oversized for this size. 200/100 kg is way more than needed. I could probably fly
it on 150 lbs/50 lbs even in pretty strong wind. But I don't believe a little added lineweight should kill performance so much. Will probably create a
lighter line set, like 150/100 or 100/100 (lbs not kg). PL really should have provided the ligther lines if they think they are too heavy like Marijn
indikates in his post.
I got the feeling that the 1.5m2 is too small, or not trimmed aggressive enough to want to go forward all the time. Could be my copy, as the videos
from Big Mike seems to present a kite that flies normally.
Kites: HQ Symphony Beach III 1.3, HQ Symphony Pro 2.2, 200x70cm no-name, Peter Lynn Hornet III 3.0m2, Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 1.5m2, PL Uniq Play 1.0.
Non-power: Std + Full vented Freilein Windrider X (Rev style quads), Freilen Transeye. ITW Triton, some chinese SLK
Sure. That was my feeling. Like it was trimmed wrong, or too much brake tension. But the brake lines where hanging in a large loop down, no tension at
all. I doubt the heavier brake lines should influence it that much, but as I wrote, I will try some much lighter brake lines, not over 100 lbs. Never
had any significant pull on those. Guess 50 lbs would be fine even in the strongest wind. Don't have any standard lines in 20m, so will have to make
some. And maybe move the sterring lines to front. 200 lbs should be fine there.
But again, it could be because lines are too heavy for the 1.5m2, or maybe the trim is off for my copy ? Or all 1.5m2 ? Couldn't get it to fly
anything like in the product advertisement video. https://youtu.be/jCW2qdfxi-s?t=53s
And there it is flewn with tight brake lines. And this is in Bft 3 or so, judged from the ocean, so more or less same wind range.
Kites: HQ Symphony Beach III 1.3, HQ Symphony Pro 2.2, 200x70cm no-name, Peter Lynn Hornet III 3.0m2, Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 1.5m2, PL Uniq Play 1.0.
Non-power: Std + Full vented Freilein Windrider X (Rev style quads), Freilen Transeye. ITW Triton, some chinese SLK