Power Kite Forum
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: APEX III - what's wrong with the depower?
BeamerBob
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 8308
Registered: 11-5-2007
Location: Down on the bayou
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 25-2-2013 at 05:14 PM


This thread is when it was explained to me years ago. tridude was one of those explaining.



Coastal Wind Sports Team Rider
Landsegler Disc wheels
PTW Hero Buggy - XXtreme ApeXX Buggy US 88 - Libre Hardcore
IvanpahBuggyExpo.com
Youtube link
Bob Muse
HQ Montana X 8m, Montana IX 12m, HQ Ignition LEI 5m,
PL Phantom 12m, 15m, Big Blu 24m+, Synergy 10m, Venom 10m, 13m , Phantom II 12m Vapors 3.8, 5.4, Crosskite Sonic 7m, PKD Combat 10.3m
Uturn Butane 2.5m PKD Buster 3m Genetrix Hydra 7m Ozone Yakuza GT 14m
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Bladerunner
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 9679
Registered: 17-10-2006
Location: Vancouver
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 25-2-2013 at 06:05 PM


A couple of points that are slightly off point.

Some kites also shape shift as you " depower " . As you trim in on your front lines the kite tightens up and it's C shape has a smaller projected area.

Many bars come with an adjustable stopper on the trim . Nice for cruising because you can set it not to depower too much and relax with the bar out slightly.


Hand out the window is the perfect way to get AOA straight in your head!



Kites: 2.5m Profoil , Quadrifoil XL kitesurfer, NPW 5 Danger.
Flexifoil: 1.7m Sting, 4.9m Blade 3, 9m Blade 2.
Flysurfer : 19m Speed 2 SA, 7m Pulse
Peter Lynn :18m Phantom, 15m Synergy, 10m Synergy, 1200 Farc, 460 Sarc, 130 Tarc, 5m Peel, 4.2m , 6.4, 8.5 C-Quads, 3.5 LS2 single skin.

Rides: Flexi / P.L. Frankin'Buggy , Shaped + straight skiis, sand skis, Coyote blades. Core 95 ATB. RKB R2 ATB .

Ken (K2)
View user's profile
Futahaguro
Junior Member
**




Posts: 64
Registered: 13-12-2012
Location: Minnesota
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 26-2-2013 at 07:38 AM


Ok, so I get the whole AOA, projected area, lift and pull stuff. I was confused on my whole "triangle" point, where if you pull one leg everything else must change to keep the same total angle. Take the "hand out the window" example, which I do quite often because it is fun:D. If the person connected to the lines is the sideview mirror, and your hand is the kite, rotate your hand and imagine what the lines would have to do if they are a fixed length.

That, is my point. Now, after reading the thread that BeamerBob posted, and others pointed out, in theory, and on some kites, the bridle, attached to the front lines, can shift the shape of the kite independently of the back lines.

Now here is my big "however". Look at the picture of the bridle layout of my Apex III and the Speed4. There are mixer pulleys between the front lines and the back lines. When I look at that layout, and I imagine trimming in, I cannot see how it could do that WITHOUT the trailing lines attached. I say WITHOUT because if the back lines are supposed to be MORE slack when you trim in that would mean they are independent of the front lines and the AOA is increasing in the bridle somehow. I cannot see how this would happen with this kite.

Now that I look at the Speed4 line plan also, I am having a very hard time understanding how the AOA can increase independently of the back lines. And if it does not move independently of the back lines, how would the back lines become MORE slack when you bring the front lines closer? This goes back to my whole "triangle" theory. Look at the Speed4 line plan. The front and back lines are 21M. Now, if you were to unhook the back line the pull would be all on A-main. If you were to trim in or out the only thing happening would be the kite getting closer and further away respectively. B-main and Z-main would be too slack to do anything and, from what I can see, would do nothing to the AOA of the kite. Now, hook up the back line and now the mixer comes into play. Trim in, to increase the AOA, and you now mix between front and back lines and it goes back to the whole "triangle" theory.

I understand the "triangle" theory goes out the window a bit because of the mixer pulley but my point is that it is not independent so how can they become more slack?

Does that make any sense?

Big versions;
http://www.rx7turbo.com/images/Apex3_Bridle.jpg
http://www.rx7turbo.com/images/Speed4_Line_Plan.jpg







Ozone Samurai II w/ Turbo Bar - 5M *SOLD*
HQ Apex III - 10M *SOLD*
PL Synergy - 15M *SOLD*
Flysurfer Speed 3 - 15M
View user's profile
snowspider
Posting Freak
*****




Posts: 1257
Registered: 13-2-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 26-2-2013 at 11:25 AM


The back lines are involved in AOA and shape as long as they have some tension on them if they are loose (because the center trim is pulled way in) the kite is fully depowered and flying as flat as the designer designed it to fly. Let the front lines out a bit(via the center trim strap) or pull on your bar and you begin to affect AOA and shape again. Your assessment is correct. Except the part about pulling in the trim increases AOA. Have you checked to see if all your lines match the line diagrams from HQ. Your whole description of whats happening to the back lines just seems wrong.



2.6 , 3.9 , 5.3 , 6.8 PL Vipers
5 , 7.5 HQ Apex II
14m HQ Montana VII
5m naish element
7m ss turbo diesel
10m pansh blaze

5m beamer dearly departed into a tree
3 "snowspider" homebuilt kite sleds
3 homebuilt buggies
1 skate board with seat on wheels or blades (the c0ckroach)
View user's profile
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top

Hosted by: Mad Moose Studio