Pages:
1
2 |
gemini6kl
Member
Posts: 279
Registered: 1-8-2010
Location: queens, NY
Member Is Offline
|
|
I would hardly think that someones opinion about something they have actually tried is misinformation, I stand by all my statements. I'm pretty sure
I'm not the only one that notices the issues. Have you even flown a smaller sized peak 2 Feyd? Well Its generally not a good idea to give an opinion
about something you never used. Pilot error huh, that's a good one and very laughable. so I guess next we will be presented with a video showing a
12m without the tip tuck. I guess that would prove that those who had the issues just didn't know wht they were doing. :P
|
|
ssayre
Posting Freak
Posts: 3588
Registered: 15-8-2013
Location: Indiana
Member Is Offline
|
|
|
|
gemini6kl
Member
Posts: 279
Registered: 1-8-2010
Location: queens, NY
Member Is Offline
|
|
Well That's great but his review of the ozone access and peak 2 basically confirms my statements the kite is finicky compared to the most of the
reputable branded kites we have out now, along with that I'm sure all the issues about the kite were not listed due to certain reason I wont go
into. My goal is not to criticize the kite just for the hell of it but to bring out the issues so that hopefully flysurfer can make it better like
I said before I'm all for new technology but if it dosent improve on what we already have I don't see the benefit of it.
I'm quoting from his own words in his review :
("After about an hour and a half of riding various sections of the lake Paul and I landed in a wind shadow and swapped kites.
I took off on the Peak 2 and after riding the Access it was a stark difference in how it felt and handled. The bar pressure was considerably higher
than the Ozone. The 4m Peak had a bit more power than the 6m Access and the delivery of that power could be smooth or abrupt depending on how you
sheeted in. The Peak 2 is not nearly the friendly cruiser the Access is but it is a lot of fun to fly. The nice thing, about the Peak is that even
with the higher power you can still ride with little to no worry of getting lofted or yarded. But it is definitely more work to fly than the Access.
After about another half hour or so Paul and I met up to compare notes. Like myself, he was amazed at the stability of the Access. While he was
playing on the Peak, at times fighting with it, he noticed how easily I was cruising around and how stabile the Access was. After taking it for a ride
he understood why. ")
Like I said in my original review of the kite the issues I encountered were, a small windrange, heavy bar pressure, an on and off power delivery,
loosing some power in turns and loops, not very stable in gusty winds , tip tucking in lighter winds when depowered. The things I liked were the near
100% depower and small packing size and the slight increase in power per size. I think his review confirmed most of the things I originally stated.
so I don't knw why I would be quoted as putting out misinformation.
with that being said I think ill refrain from talking about the peak and let others try it and give there opinion as I see we have a little bit of a
flysurfer fan club going. :o
|
|
povlhp
Junior Member
Posts: 34
Registered: 25-3-2015
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Member Is Offline
|
|
If people think the brake lines are too tight, look at this frame capture. Tell me again the brake lines are too tight. The kite only moves little
forward, and the brake lines has very visible slack. But again, will retry at some point with lighter brake lines.
Kites: HQ Symphony Beach III 1.3, HQ Symphony Pro 2.2, 200x70cm no-name, Peter Lynn Hornet III 3.0m2, Peter Lynn Uniq Quad 1.5m2, PL Uniq Play 1.0.
Non-power: Std + Full vented Freilein Windrider X (Rev style quads), Freilen Transeye. ITW Triton, some chinese SLK
|
|
Windstruck
Posting Freak
Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Get in my buggy!
|
|
@povlhp - I don't think the brake lines are too tight. Rather, as you mentioned, I think the brake lines are too HEAVY. It would appear from the
videos that you were dealing with light winds. Strong enough to launch a feather weight single skin like the 1.5 Uniq but not enough to really power
it. I used to own (and promptly sold) the 4.5m Uniq. I wanted it as a buggy engine and didn't feel it was suited for this purpose. Too small a wind
window. Not as small as the one in your video, but notably smaller than a kite I could compare it to at the time on the same day, a PL 4.0m Hornet.
I suspect the 1.5m Uniq is so small as to be overburdened with its lines, essentially stalling the kite as they pull the kite down from the sky due to
gravity. Your idea of light weight lines might work and I wish you the best of luck with that. However, I fear you may be heading for a re-sale at a
loss with this kite as I was.
As you are over in Denmark I might suggest you take a look at Born-Kite out of Germany. http://www.born-kite.de/
The NASA Star-3 single skin kites are WONDERFUL. Check out my auto signature and you'll see that I own one or two. The Uniq doesn't hold a candle to
Born kites.
Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)
Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)
Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)
Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR
NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
|
|
ssayre
Posting Freak
Posts: 3588
Registered: 15-8-2013
Location: Indiana
Member Is Offline
|
|
Povl, I could tell in your last video that your brake lines were not too tight, so that is not the issue. You might send peter lynn a message and see
what they recommend.
Gemini, everyone is entitled to their opinion but a lot of us have been flying the peak for awhile now and have a pretty good understanding of it's
flight characteristics. You said you had only flown it once? not sure about that but if that's true, then that's not enough time to judge a kite
compared to everyone else that have hundred's of hours on them.
|
|
Windstruck
Posting Freak
Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Get in my buggy!
|
|
Peaks are certainly unique beasts unto themselves, that's for sure. I own four of them and have over time come to really appreciate them a lot. Yes,
I deal from time to time with the dreaded "tip tuck". I found that putting the outside lines on the knot farthest from the handle (under the foam
pads) seems to be the best setting for me. I rarely get tip tuck anymore, and if I do a couple of pumps of the bar or some back and forth mini turns
tends to pop the kite back out to full shape. I've had a lot of hours in a buggy with the full range of Peak-2s at this point and can say, at least
in my hands, that tip tuck generally tends to happen either when the kite is grossly overpowered or when pilot error (i.e., me) goofs and lets the
kite lines go slack.
While I've not spent any real time with other DP kites from what I've read on PKF the Peak is just a different flyer than "traditional" DPs and takes
a specific flying style to get out of it what the kite is capable of. Now that I've got that down they seem to fly beautifully.
It seems a shame for us as a kite-loving family to sink down into a pissing match over contrasting kite designs. I for one don't want to head in that
direction. I look forward to seeing how the various kite companies innovate, and hopefully continue to improve, over time. Reading through the lines
I suspect PL will come out with a single skin DP at some point. FS will probably have a Peak-3, and Born-Kite has the fabled Ultra-Star in the works.
I'm not going to take the time now to find it, but I've seen some other single-skin DPs out there in development as well. Exciting times for us
single-skin fanatics! :D
Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)
Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)
Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)
Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR
NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
|
|
Windstruck
Posting Freak
Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Get in my buggy!
|
|
Wow, just like that! "Tip Tuck" on a non-Peak kite. Who'd ah thunk it? :evil:
http://www.powerkiteforum.com/viewthread.php?tid=30937
Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)
Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)
Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)
Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR
NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
|
|
Pages:
1
2 |