Power Kite Forum
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Single Skin Proto from MonJet Kiteboarding
Feyd
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 2-5-2016 at 05:24 AM


Semi-single skin. Or semi closed cell. Always thought it would be simple enough to add pockets for bladders but closed cells would be nice. Depending on how long they hold air.

Three cells don't offer a lot of volume. Loss would be fast. But better than nothing.




Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 2-5-2016 at 08:46 AM


Quote: Originally posted by Feyd  
Semi-single skin. Or semi closed cell. Always thought it would be simple enough to add pockets for bladders but closed cells would be nice. Depending on how long they hold air.

Three cells don't offer a lot of volume. Loss would be fast. But better than nothing.


Agreed Chris. Not sure what to call this kite (single skin, etc.); seems a hybrid design. I'm not jumping all over it with V-1.0. I've gotten burned on both the PL Uniq Quad 1.0 and B-K LongStar V-1.0. Time for others to step up as "first adopter" on this one! :P



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
Feyd
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 2-5-2016 at 11:08 AM


Is it just me or does the bar look really long?




Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 2-5-2016 at 11:57 AM


Quote: Originally posted by Feyd  
Is it just me or does the bar look really long?


Not just you. Several times I've freeze framed the video trying to look at the bar. It does seem odd. Maybe this kite needs a lot of line action to operate in its stated low wind range. While a really long bar can be pain for packing purposes, it is a darn right nucence when seated in a buggy, particularly if you have anything mounted on the down tube that protrudes (GPS, GoPro, water bottle cage, etc).



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
Feyd
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 3-5-2016 at 07:14 AM


A while back I was playing around with an F-Arc that we had installed a bridle on to make it fly with a flatter profile. To get it to turn the bar needed to be big. I wonder if that's the same thing here.




Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
skimtwashington
Posting Freak
*****




Posts: 1758
Registered: 22-3-2011
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 3-5-2016 at 07:12 PM



Quote:

I've gotten burned on both the PL Uniq Quad 1.0 and B-K LongStar V-1.0.


I didn't remember if it was posted ...but what was wrong with the LongStars...?

Yeah....... water relaunch w/Peak? Forget it. In the best circumstances it's possible..... But for most of the time I really doubt it.

Until Monjet back their claim and outstanding feature- with an actual video of a water re-launch, no one should give a nickel for one of these if they plan to use on water.


View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 3-5-2016 at 09:47 PM


Quote: Originally posted by skimtwashington  

Quote:

I've gotten burned on both the PL Uniq Quad 1.0 and B-K LongStar V-1.0.


I didn't remember if it was posted ...but what was wrong with the LongStars...?

Yeah....... water relaunch w/Peak? Forget it. In the best circumstances it's possible..... But for most of the time I really doubt it.

Until Monjet back their claim and outstanding feature- with an actual video of a water re-launch, no one should give a nickel for one of these if they plan to use on water.




I'm sure I wrote about this at one point or another, but I was never a fan of the LongStars. I really, really wanted to like them but they just never worked for me.

First, the good part. I think they look fantastic! I love the extended wing profile; they always make me think of Batman. If Batman was into powerkiting the LS would most certainly sit front and center in his quiver.

On the negative side: the five lines were a pain in the seat meat. If you are used to and appreciate the simplicity of the three line NASA Stars then the LSs will likely feel very cumbersome and irritating to set up and put away if you are going to be detaching the lines from the kite each time you pack up.

Second, the LS bar seems to offer the worst of all worlds. You need to fly these kites hooked into a harness if you are going to use Steffen's bar. Once hooked in, 50% of the load goes through the harness hook into your body, but the other half is on your arms all the time. This is bad enough, but made worse by the near constant fussing you need to do for optimal smooth flight. This is no Park and Ride setup.

If you try and devise various schemes to get away from his 50/50 loading bar there just doesn't seem to be good setups that don't result in the kite doing an awful amount of backflying. Once a LS starts to fly backwards it is near impossible to get it going right again until the back stall has run its course across the entire wind window.

The kites just don't seem to fly as well as the NASA Stars. No way around it, they just don't seem to fly as well.

On the positive side the kite is a bonefide four line flyer (5-line really) and as such is proficient at reverse launches. Easier to get the kite off the ground upside down than some of the Stars.

Finally, it just doesn't seem to have any better upwind performance than the Stars.

So there you have it. I'm just not a fan. Wanted to be but in the end just couldn't be.



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 06:34 AM


Inching ever closer....







Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
eric67m
Senior Member
****


Avatar


Posts: 543
Registered: 11-9-2015
Location: Monroe, Washington
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 07:46 AM


I saw this the other day.

https://youtu.be/n3dzRPZIWCY



Flying A mixed quiver of Flysurfer Peak kites.

Rollin in the Popeye The Welder Playa buggy.
View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 08:25 AM


Quote: Originally posted by eric67m  
I saw this the other day.

https://youtu.be/n3dzRPZIWCY


Same video! :moon:



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
eric67m
Senior Member
****


Avatar


Posts: 543
Registered: 11-9-2015
Location: Monroe, Washington
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 10:43 AM


I apologize, my computer opened this thread to the first page where people are commenting about no water relaunch video. I just saw that video was posted yesterday. I did not see the second page until now...



Flying A mixed quiver of Flysurfer Peak kites.

Rollin in the Popeye The Welder Playa buggy.
View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 01:16 PM


Quote: Originally posted by eric67m  
I apologize, my computer opened this thread to the first page where people are commenting about no water relaunch video. I just saw that video was posted yesterday. I did not see the second page until now...


No worries! The larger question is when on earth is this kite going to be available and will it actually fill a niche? I don't do wind powered water sports so I don't see the point for me personally, but who knows, maybe there are a bunch of folks out there just begging for a light weight water flyer for low wind days. If yes, then I would think they need to bump up the sizes quite a bit. The original prototype was 9m, not this 6m kite. I'd think you'd want to be in the 12m - 15m size zone to get enough grunt on low wind days. Once the wind is high enough to make a 6m the right choice there are plenty of good water options out there.

I noticed that the video showed a beautiful nose down position in the water. Often times when SS kites come out of the sky it is due to lack of sufficient wind. The kite may well collapse and hit the water in a wet mess, closed cells be damned. That's the way Peaks and LS2s often fall.

I'm also curious how the closed cells are inflated. Pump? If yes then why not go all the way with an LEI for all its advantages. Weight would be one major factor, thus the call for bigger sizes.

:karate:



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
soliver
Posting Freak
*****




Posts: 3913
Registered: 15-12-2011
Location: somewhere, far, far away
Member Is Offline

Mood: sleepy

[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 04:26 PM


It looks like a hybrid between an LEI and a closed cell foil. I'm guessing that the 2 baffles on the front inflate a large bladder in the leading edge similar to an LEI.... just a guess from what you can see of the kite.



I'm going to take a nap now
View user's profile
Feyd
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 2956
Registered: 3-1-2009
Location: Norther New England
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-4-2017 at 04:28 PM


The point beyond water relaunch would be added stability in wind shifts. There are 2 intakes at the leading edge for inflation. Since it's still in proto stage it will take time to see the bigger sizes. Scaling a kite is a huge project. But if you are going to make a one off, you make a small one. Easier, less sewing, less expensive and less risky. Give the poor guy some time. He's doing some pretty impressive work.
;)



Chris Krug-Owner @ Hardwater Kiting. Authorized Dealer of Ozone, Flysurfer, HQ kites.
www.hardwaterkiter.com 603-986-2784
View user's profile Visit user's homepage
Demoknight
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1150
Registered: 7-6-2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Member Is Offline

Mood: ADIDAK

[*] posted on 17-4-2017 at 12:58 PM


Yeah scaling kites is tough. Makers need to tweak the kites at each size to maintain the same flight characteristics across the range. It has to do with the myth that a bumble bee shouldn't be able to fly according to our understanding of aerodynamics. The fact is that scale changes the way airfoils react with the air. If you scale a bumble bee up to the size of a person or a car, then I doubt it would fly. The scale matters so much.



NAPKA US8008

Kites:

Ozone R1 V3 7m
Flysurfer Sonic v3 15m
Flysurfer Speed 3 Deluxe 19m
Peter Lynn Charger 2 12m
Ozone Access Reride 6m
Peter Lynn 2013 Reactor 5.5m
Peter Lynn 2013 Reactor 8.6m
Prism Tensor 5.0m

Ride:
GT-Race Code:R6
Weird Beard VTT Custom
View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 17-4-2017 at 02:33 PM


Quote: Originally posted by Feyd  


Give the poor guy some time. He's doing some pretty impressive work.



I didn't intend to come off harsh. I'm personally thrilled he is innovating in the SS DP lane! I just went on their website and see that they are now looking to release versions of this kite in 6m and 10m sizes. That's a nice little quiver. :thumbup:



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
Ed Cline
Senior Member
****


Avatar


Posts: 638
Registered: 25-5-2016
Location: Raleigh, NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: Truth, Justice, and The American Way.

[*] posted on 18-4-2017 at 12:57 PM


Line up for "Dibs on Steve's LS2's. Unless the Playa takes them first. :crazy:



Flying mostly single skins, with some orphans, the American flag, and a PL buggy. US01
View user's profile
Windstruck
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3341
Registered: 16-5-2015
Location: St George, UT, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Get in my buggy!

[*] posted on 18-4-2017 at 02:21 PM


Quote: Originally posted by Ed Cline  
Line up for "Dibs on Steve's LS2's. Unless the Playa takes them first. :crazy:


Hey! I resemble that remark. :evil:



Born-Kites:
RaceStar+ (3.0m, 5.0m, 7.0m, 9.0m)
NasaStar-5 (2.5m, 4.0m)
NasaStar-4 (2.5m)
NasaStar-3 (3.2m)

Ozone kites:
Access (6.0m)

Flysurfer Kites:
Peak-5 (2.5m)

Buggy:
Peter Lynn BigFoot+ nose & tail; midsection VTT rail & seat kit; home-brewed AQR

NAPKA Member US2815
SWATK Member UT0003
View user's profile
Randy
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1893
Registered: 20-5-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 18-4-2017 at 07:08 PM


Quote: Originally posted by skimtwashington  

Quote:

I've gotten burned on both the PL Uniq Quad 1.0 and B-K LongStar V-1.0.


I didn't remember if it was posted ...but what was wrong with the LongStars...?

Yeah....... water relaunch w/Peak? Forget it. In the best circumstances it's possible..... But for most of the time I really doubt it.

Until Monjet back their claim and outstanding feature- with an actual video of a water re-launch, no one should give a nickel for one of these if they plan to use on water.




Video's aren't all that compelling. Take enough video and you can show even a NPW water re-launch.:D







NPW Test Pilot -US99
View user's profile
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top

Hosted by: Mad Moose Studio